Cited by 146Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About Colonoscopy

Open access
Lee, Tsung-Chun, Staller, Kyle, Botoman, Vlaicu, Pathipati, Mythili P., Varma, Sanskriti, Kuo, Braden·2023·Gastroenterology

Abstract

ChatGPT (OpenAI) is a 175 billion–parameter large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI) that was released in November 2022. ChatGPT is developed based on the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) 3.5 natural language processing technology and provides a conversational text response to a given prompt.1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.033

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMMs have achieved significant advancements in various application scenarios, and the implementation of LLMMs provides critical insights for various parties within healthcare providers and patients.

    “LLMMs have achieved significant advancements in various application scenarios, the implementation of LLMMs provides critical insights for various parties within healthcare providers and patients.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ladabaum U, et al. Gastroenterology 2019;157:137-148.
  2. Gilson A, et al. JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e45312.
  3. Stokel-Walker C, et al. Nature 2023;614:214-216.
  4. Mbakwe AB, et al. PLOS Digit Health 2023;2:e0000205.
  5. Gaumgartner C. Clin Transl Med 2023;13:e1206.
  6. Howard A, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2023;23:405-406.
  7. Lee P, et al. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1233-1239.
  8. Sackett DL, et al. Br J Med 1996;312:71-72. Supplementary References
  9. Murphy B, et al. Surgeon 2022;20:E366-E370.
  10. Avra TD, et al. J Vasc Surg 2022;76:1728-1732.
  11. National Library of Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov. Accessed April 12, 2023. 511.e1 Lee et al Gastroenterology Vol. 165, Iss. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, T.-C., Staller, K., Botoman, V., Pathipati, M. P., Varma, S., & Kuo, B.
Affiliations
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kuo, Braden
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
165
Issue
2
Pages
509-511.e7
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4372231834
Cited by
146
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 31
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K23 DK120945)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, colonoscopy, patient education, artificial intelligence, natural language processing, conversational AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review