Cited by 76Cardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareECG Monitoring and Analysis

Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy

Open access
Soto, Jessica Torres, Weston Hughes, J, Sanchez, Pablo Amador, Perez, Marco, Ouyang, David, Ashley, Euan A·2022·European Heart Journal - Digital Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Aims: Determining the aetiology of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can be challenging due to the similarity in clinical presentation and cardiac morphological features of diverse causes of disease. In particular, distinguishing individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from the much larger set of individuals with manifest or occult hypertension (HTN) is of major importance for family screening and the prevention of sudden death. We hypothesized that an artificial intelligence method based joint interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms and echocardiogram videos could augment physician interpretation. Methods and results: We chose not to train on proximate data labels such as physician over-reads of ECGs or echocardiograms but instead took advantage of electronic health record derived clinical blood pressure measurements and diagnostic consensus (often including molecular testing) among physicians in an HCM centre of excellence. Using more than 18 000 combined instances of electrocardiograms and echocardiograms from 2728 patients, we developed LVH-fusion. On held-out test data, LVH-fusion achieved an F1-score of 0.71 in predicting HCM, and 0.96 in predicting HTN. In head-to-head comparison with human readers LVH-fusion had higher sensitivity and specificity rates than its human counterparts. Finally, we use explainability techniques to investigate local and global features that positively and negatively impact LVH-fusion prediction estimates providing confirmation from unsupervised analysis the diagnostic power of lateral T-wave inversion on the ECG and proximal septal hypertrophy on the echocardiogram for HCM. Conclusion: These results show that deep learning can provide effective physician augmentation in the face of a common diagnostic dilemma with far reaching implications for the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac033

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soto et al. showed late fusion with averaging results can outperform other late and intermediate fusion strategies.

    “Soto et al. [84] showed that late fusion with averaging results can outperform other late and intermediate fusion strategies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Semsarian C, Ingles J, Maron MS, Maron BJ. New perspectives on the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 1249– 1254. 25814232
  2. [2]Ho CY, Day SM, Ashley EA, Michels M, Pereira AC, Jacoby D, Cirino AL, Fox JC, Lakdawala NK, Ware JS, Caleshu CA, Helms AS, Colan SD, Girolami F, Cecchi F, Seidman CE, Sajeev G, Signorovitch J, Green EM, Olivotto I Genotype and Lifetime Burden of Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights from the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe). Circulation 2018; 138: 1387– 1398. 30297972 PMC6170149
  3. [3]Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71: e13– e115. 29133356
  4. [4]Magnusson P, Palm A, Branden E, Mörner S. Misclassification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: validation of diagnostic codes. Clin Epidemiol 2017; 9: 403– 410. 28848363 PMC5557115
  5. [5]Esteva A, Chou K, Yeung S, Naik N, Madani A, Mottaghi A, Liu Y, Topol E, Dean J, Socher R Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4: 5. 33420381 PMC7794558
  6. [6]Pennacchini E, Musumeci MB, Fierro S, Francia P, Autore C. Distinguishing hypertension from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as a cause of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Clin Hypertens 2015; 17: 239– 241. PMC8032077 25582947
  7. [7]Doi YL, Deanfield JE, McKenna WJ, Dargie HJ, Oakley CM, Goodwin JF Echocardiographic differentiation of hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1980; 44: 395– 400. 6448611 PMC482417
  8. [8]Attia ZI, Friedman PA, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Ladewig DJ, Satam G, Pellikka PA, Munger TM, Asirvatham SJ, Scott CG, Carter RE, Kapa S Age and sex estimation using artificial intelligence from standard 12-Lead ECGs. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019; 12: e007284. 31450977 PMC7661045
  9. [9]Hannun AY, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, Tison GH, Bourn C, Turakhia MP, Ng AY Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med 2019; 25: 65– 69. 30617320 PMC6784839
  10. [10]Kwon J-M, Cho Y, Jeon K-H, Cho S, Kim K-H, Baek SD, Jeung S, Park J, Oh B-H A deep learning algorithm to detect anaemia with ECGs: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2: e358– e367. 33328095
  11. [11]Yao X, Rushlow DR, Inselman JW, McCoy RG, Thacher TD, Behnken EM, Bernard ME, Rosas SL, Akfaly A, Misra A, Molling PE, Krien JS, Foss RM, Barry BA, Siontis KC, Kapa S, Pellikka PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Attia ZI, Shah ND, Friedman PA, Noseworthy PA Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiograms for identification of patients with low ejection fraction: a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial. Nature Medicine 2021. 33958795
  12. [12]Madani A, Ong JR, Tibrewal A, Mofrad MRK. Deep echocardiography: data-efficient supervised and semi-supervised deep learning towards automated diagnosis of cardiac disease. NPJ Digit Med 2018; 1: 59. 31304338 PMC6550282
  13. [14]Huang S-C, Pareek A, Zamanian R, Banerjee I, Lungren MP. Multimodal fusion with deep neural networks for leveraging CT imaging and electronic health record: a case-study in pulmonary embolism detection. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 22147. 33335111 PMC7746687
  14. [15]Goto S, Mahara K, Beussink-Nelson L, Ikura H, Katsumata Y, Endo J, Gaggin HK, Shah SJ, Itabashi Y, MacRae CA, Deo RC Artificial intelligence-enabled fully automated detection of cardiac amyloidosis using electrocardiograms and echocardiograms. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 2726. 33976142 PMC8113484
  15. [16]Zhang J, Gajjala S, Agrawal P, Tison GH, Hallock LA, Beussink-Nelson L, Lassen MH, Fan E, Aras MA, Jordan C, Fleischmann KE, Melisko M, Qasim A, Shah SJ, Bajcsy R, Deo RC Fully Automated Echocardiogram Interpretation in Clinical Practice. Circulation 2018; 138: 1623– 1635. 30354459 PMC6200386
  16. [17]Null N, Ommen SR, Mital S, Burke MA, Day SM, Deswal A, Elliott P, Evanovich LL, Hung J, Joglar JA, Kantor P, Kimmelstiel C, Kittleson M, Link MS, Maron MS, Martinez MW, Miyake CY, Schaff HV 2020 AHA/ACC guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2020; 142: e558– e631. 33215931
  17. [18]Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, MacLaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, Williams KA, Williamson JD, Wright JT 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71: 1269– 1324. 29133354
  18. [19]Kay W, Carreira J, Simonyan K, Zhang B, Hillier C, Vijayanarasimhan S, Viola F, Green T, Back T, Natsev P, Suleyman M The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv [cs.CV] 2017.
  19. [20]Sundararajan M, Taly A, Yan Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. arXiv [cs.LG] 2017.
  20. [21]Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Asirvatham SJ, Deshmukh AJ, Gersh BJ, Carter RE, Yao X, Rabinstein AA, Erickson BJ, Kapa S, Friedman PA An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet 2019; 394: 861– 867. 31378392
  21. [22]Sagi O, Rokach L. Ensemble learning: a survey. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 2018; 8: e1249.
  22. [23]Hughes JW, Yuan N, He B, Ouyang J, Ebinger J, Botting P, Lee J, Theurer J, Tooley JE, Neiman K, Lungren MP, Liang D, Schnittger I, Harrington B, Chen JH, Ashley EA, Cheng S, Ouyang D, Zou JY Deep learning prediction of biomarkers from echocardiogram videos. bioRxiv 2021. PMC8524103 34656880
  23. [25]Tran D, Wang H, Torresani L, Ray J, LeCun Y, Paluri M A closer look at spatiotemporal convolutions for action recognition. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vision Pattern Recognition 2018: 6450– 6459.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soto, J. T., Weston Hughes, J., Sanchez, P. A., Perez, M., Ouyang, D., & Ashley, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Department of Computer Science, Stanford University , USA
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ashley, Euan A
Venue
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Published
2022-05-23
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
380-389
ISSN
2634-3916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281400187
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stanford University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypertension, multimodal deep learning, septal hypertrophy, sudden cardiac death prevention, explainable AI, family screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review