Cited by 92Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence Applications

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Care—Part 2: Applications

Open access
Jain, Sneha S., Elias, Pierre, Poterucha, Timothy, Randazzo, Michael, Lopez Jimenez, Francisco, Khera, Rohan, Perez, Marco, Ouyang, David +13 more·2024·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Recent artificial intelligence (AI) advancements in cardiovascular care offer potential enhancements in effective diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. More than 600 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical AI algorithms now exist, with 10% focusing on cardiovascular applications, highlighting the growing opportunities for AI to augment care. This review discusses the latest advancements in the field of AI, with a particular focus on the utilization of multimodal inputs and the field of generative AI. Further discussions in this review involve an approach to understanding the larger context in which AI-augmented care may exist, and include a discussion of the need for rigorous evaluation, appropriate infrastructure for deployment, ethics and equity assessments, regulatory oversight, and viable business cases for deployment. Embracing this rapidly evolving technology while setting an appropriately high evaluation benchmark with careful and patient-centered implementation will be crucial for cardiology to leverage AI to enhance patient care and the provider experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.03.401

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The US FDA has a new digital health innovation plan that proposes a pragmatic risk-based approach to regulate software and wearable medical devices through precertification programs.

    “Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration has a new digital health innovation plan that proposes a pragmatic risk-based approach to regulate software and wearable medical devices through precertification programs that aim to assess and determine appropriate product development.52”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41]Executive Office of the President. Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Federal Register. 2023; 88: 75191– 75226.
  2. [69]Zink A, Obermeyer Z, Pierson E. Race corrections in clinical models: Examining family history and cancer risk. bioRxiv. 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jain, S. S., Elias, P., Poterucha, T., Randazzo, M., Lopez Jimenez, F., Khera, R., Perez, M., Ouyang, D., Pirruccello, J., Salerno, M., Einstein, A. J., Avram, R., Tison, G. H., Nadkarni, G., Natarajan, V., Pierson, E., Beecy, A., Kumaraiah, D., Haggerty, C., Avari Silva, J. N., & Maddox, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Cornell Tech (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
83
Issue
24
Pages
2487-2496
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394061293
Cited by
74
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 12
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od026880-01, 1s10od030463-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UG3HL165065, K08HL159346)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence in cardiology, cardiovascular care, multimodal data, generative AI, AI evaluation, regulatory oversight, diagnosis and treatment
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review