Cited by 97Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyVascular anomalies and interventionsUltrasound in Clinical Applications

The effect of breathing manner on inferior vena caval diameter

Kimura, B. J., Dalugdugan, R., Gilcrease, G. W., Phan, J. N., Showalter, B. K., Wolfson, T.·2011·European Journal of Echocardiography

Abstract

AIMS: Although the inspiratory 'collapse' of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has been used to signify normal central venous pressure, the effect of the manner of breathing IVC size is incompletely understood. As intra-abdominal pressure rises during descent of the diaphragm, we hypothesized that inspiration through diaphragmatic excursion may have a compressive effect on the IVC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured minimal and maximal intrahepatic IVC diameter on echocardiography and popliteal venous return by spectral Doppler during isovolemic inspiratory efforts in 19 healthy non-obese volunteers who were instructed to inhale using either diaphragmatic or chest wall expansion. During inspiration, the maximal diaphragmatic excursion and popliteal vein flow were compared between breathing methods. The IVC 'collapsibility index,' IVCCI, was calculated as (IVC(max)-IVC(min))/IVC(max). The difference in diaphragmatic excursion between diaphragmatic and chest wall breaths in each subject was correlated with the corresponding change in IVCCI. Diaphragmatic breathing resulted in more diaphragmatic excursion than chest wall breathing (median 3.4 cm, range 1.7-5.8 vs. 2.2 cm, range 1.0-5.2, P= 0.0003), and was universally associated with decreased popliteal venous return (19/19 vs. 9/19 subjects, P< 0.004). The difference in diaphragmatic excursion correlated with the difference in IVCCI (Spearman's rho = 0.53, P= 0.024). CONCLUSION: During inspiration of equivalent tidal volumes, the reduction in IVC diameter and lower extremity venous return was related to diaphragmatic excursion, suggesting that the IVC may be compressed through descent of the diaphragm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq157

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in diaphragmatic breathers have reported increased efficiency of venous return, maximally during slow respiration, due to diaphragmatic excursion enhancing the collapsibility of the inferior vena cava that occurs during normal inspiration.

    “Studies in diaphragmatic breathers have reported increased efficiency of venous return, maximally during slow respiration, due to diaphragmatic excursion enhancing the collapsibility of the inferior vena cava that occurs during normal inspiration [32, 33].”

    From The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human (2017) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography. 5th ed . Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins; 1994. p210-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimura, B. J., Dalugdugan, R., Gilcrease, G. W., Phan, J. N., Showalter, B. K., & Wolfson, T.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Mercy Hospital (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Kimura, B. J.
Venue
European Journal of Echocardiography
Published
2010-10-27
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
120-123
ISSN
  • 1525-2167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2114
OpenAlex
W2124876415
Cited by
97
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Echocardiography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
inferior vena cava, breathing pattern, diaphragmatic breathing, diaphragmatic excursion, IVC collapsibility index, central venous pressure
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Central Venous Pressure, Female, Humans, Hydrostatic Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Popliteal Vein, Respiration, Tidal Volume, Ultrasonography, Vena Cava, Inferior, Statistics, Nonparametric, Point-of-Care Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review