Cited by 41Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCraniofacial Disorders and Treatmentsdental development and anomalies

Treatment timing for functional jaw orthopaedics followed by fixed appliances: a controlled long-term study

Open access
Pavoni, Chiara, Lombardo, Elisabetta Cretella, Lione, Roberta, Faltin, Kurt, McNamara, James A, Cozza, Paola, Franchi, Lorenzo·2018·European Journal of Orthodontics

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of treatment timing on long-term dentoskeletal effects of Class II treatment with removable functional appliances followed by full-fixed appliance therapy. Materials and methods: A group of 46 patients (23 females and 23 males) with Class II malocclusion treated consecutively with either Bionator or Activator, followed by fixed appliances was compared with a matched control group of 31 subjects (16 females and 15 males) with untreated Class II malocclusion. The treated sample was evaluated at T1, start of treatment (mean age: 9.9 ± 1.3 years); T2, end of functional treatment and prior to fixed appliances (mean age: 11.9 ± 1.3 years); and T3, long-term observation (mean age: 18.3 ± 2.1 years). The treated and the control samples were divided into pre-pubertal and pubertal groups according to skeletal maturity observed at the start of treatment. Statistical comparisons were performed with independent sample t-tests. Results: When treatment was initiated before puberty, Class II correction was mostly confined to the dentoalveolar changes, with significant improvements of both overjet and molar relationships. On the other hand, treatment with the outset at puberty produced significant long-term improvement of sagittal skeletal relationships, which were mainly sustained by mandibular changes. Conclusions: Treatment with removable functional appliances (Bionator or Activator) followed by full-fixed appliances produced significant skeletal long-term changes when it begins at puberty. Prepubertal Class II treatment results primarily in dentoalveolar changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ejo/cjx078

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McNamara, J.A. Jr. and Brudon, W.L. (2001) Orthodontics and Dentofa- cial Orthopedics. Needham Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 63-73.
  2. Janson, I. (1977) A cephalometric study of the efficiency of the Bionator. Transactions European Orthodontic Society, 53, 283-293.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavoni, C., Lombardo, E. C., Lione, R., Faltin, K., McNamara, J. A., Cozza, P., & Franchi, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Universidade Paulista (BR)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Franchi, Lorenzo
Venue
European Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2017-11-01
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
430-436
ISSN
  • 0141-5387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2210
OpenAlex
W2765948530
Cited by
41
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Orthodontics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
treatment timing, Class II malocclusion, functional orthodontic appliances, Bionator, activators, fixed orthodontic appliances, puberty onset, mandibular changes, overjet, molar relationship, dentoalveolar changes
MeSH terms
Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed, Activator Appliances, Adolescent, Adult, Cephalometry, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Mandible, Orthodontics, Corrective, Sexual Maturation, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Orthodontic Appliances, Functional, Young Adult, Overbite

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review