Teacher talk and the classroom context
Abstract
In the era of communicative language teaching, analyses of teacher talk typically focus on the characteristics that make, or fail to make such talk ‘communicative’. In most cases, the criteria for communicativeness are taken from what is felt to constitute communicative behaviour in the world outside the classroom. Thus, communicative classroom are held to be those in which features of genuine communication are evident, and, by exclusion, classes where they are not present are considered to be uncommunicative. In the case of teacher talk, similar criteria might be used to assess such aspects of classroom language use as the kind of questions teachers ask their students, or the way they respond to student contributions. In this article, I argue that this analysis of teacher talk is over-simplistic, and ultimately unhelpful to teachers since its attempt to characterize communicativeness only in terms of features of authentic communication which pertain outside the classroom ignores the reality of the classroom context and the features which make for effective communication within that context
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repetitions of one's own or a learner's utterance are observable in real-life interactions.
“These repetitions, albeit produced mixed results in the literature (Cullen, 1998; Szulc-Kurpaska, 2019; Urhahne et al., 2020), are observable in real-life interactions.”
From Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation (2023) · cites this paper as Cullen, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher Interruptions and Limited Wait Time in EFL Young Learner Classrooms
Yataganbaba, E., & Yıldırım, R. (2016) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.094 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: Scale Development and Validation
Tajeddin, Z., & Kamali, J. (2023) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2023.35.01 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Language Teacher Classroom Discourse and Interaction: A Systematic Review
Riordan, E. (2024) · Springer International Handbooks of Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43208-8_17-1
- Authors
- Cullen, R.
- Affiliations
- British Council (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cullen, R.
- Venue
- ELT Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-187
- ISSN
- 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2151516367
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ELT Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- teacher discourse, communicative language teaching, classroom communication, communicativeness, classroom context, teacher questioning, classroom language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review