CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Language Teacher Classroom Discourse and Interaction: A Systematic Review

Riordan, Elaine·2024·Springer International Handbooks of Education
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-43208-8_17-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-43208-8_17-1

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. References. marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.
  2. Baumgart, J. (2018). “The limits of my language are the limits of my world”: Teacher development through dialogic reflection in cross-disciplinary collaborative action research in a second level mathematics classroom in Ireland [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of Limerick, Limerick.
  3. Brennan Seely, J. (2021). Teacher talk at three stages of English language teacher career development- A corpus-aided study [Ph.D. Thesis]. Mary Immaculate College, Limerick.
  4. Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  5. Kerr, P. (2019). The use of L1 in English language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  6. *Lee, J. (2019). Teacher entries into second turn positions: IRFs in collaborative teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.001 · DOI
  7. *Mertelj, D. (2019). Teacher talk in higher education as a language for specific purposes: Its features and LSP teachers’ awareness. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2019.120699 · DOI
  8. *Miri, M., & Qassemi, Z. (2015). Delving into EAP teachers’ classroom behaviour: Construction or obstruction of learning opportunities in EFL context. The Journal of Teaching English For Specific And Academic Purposes, 31114, 149–164. https://espeap.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/espeap/article/view/206
  9. Walsh, S. (2015). Classroom interaction for language teachers. TESOL Press.
  10. Walsh, S. (2019). SETTVEO: Evidence-based reflection and teacher development. British Council.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Authors
Riordan, E.
Affiliations
University of Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
Riordan, Elaine
ORCID
Riordan, Elaine
Venue
Springer International Handbooks of Education
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2024
Pages
1-38
ISSN
  • 2197-1951 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-196X
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-43208-8_17-1
OpenAlex
W4403530440
Cited by
0
References
106
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer international handbooks of education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
classroom interaction, language teaching, technology-mediated communication, language learning, TESOL, modern foreign languages, discourse features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review