Cited by 198Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

MARKK, a Ste20‐like kinase, activates the polarity‐inducing kinase MARK/PAR‐1

Open access
Timm, Thomas, Li, Xiao‐Yu, Biernat, Jacek, Jiao, Jian, Mandelkow, Eckhard, Vandekerckhove, Joel, Mandelkow, Eva‐Maria·2003·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

MARK, a kinase family related to PAR-1 involved in establishing cell polarity, phosphorylates microtubule-associated proteins (tau/MAP2/MAP4) at KXGS motifs, causes detachment from microtubules, and their disassembly. The sites are prominent in tau from Alzheimer's disease brains. We studied the activation of MARK and identified the upstream kinase, MARKK, a member of the Ste20 kinase family. It phosphorylates MARK within the activation loop (T208 in MARK2). A fraction of MARK in brain tissue is doubly phosphorylated (at T208/S212), reminiscent of the activation of MAP kinase; however, the phosphorylation of the second site in MARK (S212) is inhibitory. In cells the activity of MARKK enhances microtubule dynamics through the activation of MARK and leads to phosphorylation and detachment of tau or equivalent MAPs from microtubules. Overexpression of MARK eventually leads to microtubule breakdown and cell death, but in neuronal cells the primary effect is to allow the development of neurites during differentiation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/cdg447

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GSK-3β has recently been shown to phosphorylate a key regulatory Ser in PAR-1; however, it remains unclear whether this activates or inactivates PAR-1.

    “GSK-3β has recently been shown to phosphorylate a key regulatory Ser in PAR-1; however, it remains unclear whether this activates (119) or inactivates PAR-1 (120,121).”
  • LKB-1 phosphorylates and activates PAR-1, but also phosphorylates the inactivating Ser-9 on GSK-3β and may be the elusive GSK-3β kinase activated by Wnt signaling.

    “LKB-1 phosphorylates and activates PAR-1 (120,122,123), but also phosphorylates the inactivating Ser-9 on GSK-3β and may be the elusive GSK-3β kinase activated by Wnt signaling (124).”

    From Functional genomic screen and network analysis reveal novel modifiers of tauopathy dissociated from tau phosphorylation (2011) · cites this paper as [120]

    This source is cited for the PAR-1 activation clause, not the separately cited GSK-3β clause. The Introduction identifies MARKK as a kinase that phosphorylates and activates MARK/PAR-1, but neither it nor the passages retrieved for LKB-1 say that LKB-1 does so. The copy does not rule out LKB-1 as another activating kinase. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chen,Z., Gibson,T.B., Robinson,F., Silvestro,L., Pearson,G., Xu Be,B.E., Wright,A., Vanderbilt,C. and Cobb,M.H. (2001) MAP Kinases. Chem. Rev., 101, 2449±2476.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timm, T., Li, X., Biernat, J., Jiao, J., Mandelkow, E., Vandekerckhove, J., & Mandelkow, E.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology (DE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Mandelkow, Eva‐Maria
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
22
Issue
19
Pages
5090-5101
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2063368579
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Mark, protease-activated receptor 1, cell polarity, tau phosphorylation, microtubule dynamics, MAP2, MAP4, microtubule disassembly, neuronal differentiation, neurite development, Alzheimer's disease, cell death
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Molecular Sequence Data, Swine, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review