The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Health of America’s Aging Prison Population
Open accessAbstract
Older incarcerated individuals comprise the fastest growing demographic in the US prison system. Unhealthy lifestyles among incarcerated individuals and inadequate health care lead to earlier onset and more rapid progression of many chronic conditions that are prevalent among community-living older adults. There are limited peer-reviewed epidemiologic data in this area; however, there is growing interest in identifying strategies for housing aging incarcerated individuals, delivering appropriate health care in prisons, and coordinating after-release health care. In this systematic review, we summarize the epidemiologic evidence of the health challenges facing the aging US prison population. Our comprehensive literature search focused on health outcomes, including diseases, comorbid conditions, mental health, cognition, and mobility. From 12,486 articles identified from the literature search, we reviewed 21 studies published between 2007 and 2017. All the studies were observational and cross-sectional, and most (n = 17) were based on regional samples. Sample sizes varied widely, ranging from 25 to 14,499 incarcerated people (median, 258). In general, compared with their younger counterparts, older incarcerated individuals reported high rates of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular conditions, and liver disease. Mental health problems were common, especially anxiety, fear of desire for death or suicide, and depression. Activities of daily living were challenging for up to one-fifth of the population. We found no empirical data on cognition among older incarcerated individuals. The findings of this review reveal few empirical data in this area and highlight the need for new data to drive policy and practice patterns that address critical health issues related to the aging prison population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Binswanger, I. A., Krueger, P. M., & Steiner, J. F. (2009) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2009.090662 · Cited by 731
Ahalt, C., Bolano, M., Wang, E. A., & Williams, B. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2161 · Cited by 67
Prisoner Health and Valuation of Life, Loneliness, and Depressed Mood
Merten, M. J., Bishop, A. J., & Williams, A. L. (2012) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.36.2.12 · Cited by 20
Cited by
Brooke, J., & Rybacka, M. (2020) · Journal of Correctional Health Care · doi:10.1177/1078345820916444 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Skarupski, K. A., Gross, A., Schrack, J. A., Deal, J. A., & Eber, G. B.
- Venue
- Epidemiologic Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-165
- ISSN
- 0193-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1478-6729
- OpenAlex
- W2791291391
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Health of America’s Aging Prison Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/epirev/mxx020
- The paper
- Skarupski, K. A., Gross, A., Schrack, J. A., Deal, J. A., & Eber, G. B. (2018). The Health of America’s Aging Prison Population. Epidemiologic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxx020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.