Prevalence of chronic medical conditions among jail and prison inmates in the USA compared with the general population
Abstract
Background: Despite growing inmate populations in the USA, inmates are excluded from most national health surveys and little is known about whether the prevalence of chronic disease differs between inmates and the non-institutionalised population. Methods: Nationally representative, cross-sectional data from the 2002 Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 2004 Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities and 2002–4 National Health Interview Survey Sample Adult Files on individuals aged 18–65 were used. Binary and multinomial logistic regression were used to compare the prevalence of self-reported chronic medical conditions among jail (n = 6582) and prison (n = 14 373) inmates and non-institutionalised (n = 76 597) adults after adjusting for age, sex, race, education, employment, the USA as birthplace, marital status and alcohol consumption. Prevalence and adjusted ORs with 95% CIs were calculated for nine important chronic conditions. Results: Compared with the general population, jail and prison inmates had higher odds of hypertension (OR jail 1.19; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.31; OR prison 1.17; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.27), asthma (OR jail 1.41; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.56; OR prison 1.34; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.46), arthritis (OR jail 1.65; 95% CI 1.47 to 1.84; OR prison 1.66; 95% CI 1.54 to 1.80), cervical cancer (OR jail 4.16; 95% CI 3.13 to 5.53; OR prison 4.82; 95% CI 3.74 to 6.22), and hepatitis (OR jail 2.57; 95% CI 2.20 to 3.00; OR prison 4.23; 95% CI 3.71 to 4.82), but no increased odds of diabetes, angina or myocardial infarction, and lower odds of obesity. Conclusions: Jail and prison inmates had a higher burden of most chronic medical conditions than the general population even with adjustment for important sociodemographic differences and alcohol consumption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incarceration and any exposure to the criminal legal system is deleterious to individual health.
“Mounting evidence finds that incarceration – indeed, any exposure to the criminal legal system – is deleterious to individual, family, and community health.”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473 · see citing works
Serious mental disorder in 23 000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys
Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07740-1 · Cited by 2,201 · see citing works
Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration
Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900201 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Massoglia, M., & Pridemore, W. A. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112326 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Race and Disability: From Analogy to Intersectionality
Frederick, A., & Shifrer, D. (2019) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649218783480 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ahalt, C., Bolano, M., Wang, E. A., & Williams, B. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2161 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Effectiveness of a voluntary nutrition education workshop in a state prison
Curd, P., Ohlmann, K., & Bush, H. (2013) · Journal of Correctional Health Care · doi:10.1177/1078345812474645 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Geana, M. V., Anderson, S., Lipnicky, A., Wickliffe, J. L., & Ramaswamy, M. (2021) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.2021.0053 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review
Hawks, L., Lopoo, E., Puglisi, L., Cellini, J., Thompson, K., Halberstam, A., Tolliver, D., Martinez-Hamilton, S., & Wang, E. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Americas · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100150 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Digital health experiences of incarcerated populations using telemedicine in North Carolina prisons
Khairat, S., Wallace, E., Bohlmann, A., Zebrowski, A., Stabile, K., Yao, Y., Lakdawala, A., Edson, B., & Catlett, T. (2022) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/23743735221092611 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Binswanger, I. A., Krueger, P. M., & Steiner, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Corresponding author
- Binswanger, I A
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-07-30
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 912-919
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2125663357
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 44.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, R21 HD 51146, R21HD051146, R24 HD 42849)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Keywords
- chronic disease prevalence, jail inmates, prisoners, prison population, hypertension, asthma, arthritis, cervical cancer, hepatitis, diabetes mellitus, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular disease, health disparities, prison health care, general population comparison, National Health Interview Survey
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review