Cited by 67Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisHealth and Medical Research ImpactsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The State of Research Funding From the National Institutes of Health for Criminal Justice Health Research

Open access
Ahalt, Cyrus, Bolano, Marielle, Wang, Emily A., Williams, Brie·2015·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 20 million Americans are currently or have been incarcerated. Most are from medically underserved populations; 1 in 3 African American men and 1 in 6 Latino men born in 2001 are projected to go to prison during their lifetime. The amount of funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to understand and improve the health of persons involved with the criminal justice system is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe NIH funding for research on the health and health care needs of criminal justice-involved persons. DESIGN: Review of NIH grants (2008-2012) in the RePORT (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools) database. SETTING: U.S. criminal justice system. PATIENTS: Criminal justice-involved persons participating in NIH-funded clinical research. MEASUREMENTS: NIH research and training grants awarded, by number, type, research area, institute or center, and dollar amount. RESULTS: Of more than 250 000 NIH-funded grants, 180 (<0.1%) focused on criminal justice health research. The 3 most common foci were substance use or HIV (64%), mental health (11%), and juvenile health (8%). The National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute of Mental Health funded 78% of all grants. In 2012, the NIH invested $40.9 million in criminal justice health research, or 1.5% of the $2.7 billion health disparities budget for that year. LIMITATION: NIH-supported research that did not explicitly include current or former prisoners but may have relevance to criminal justice health was not included. CONCLUSION: Federal funding for research focused on understanding and improving the health of criminal justice-involved persons is small, even compared with the NIH's overall investment in health disparities research. The NIH is well-positioned to transform the care of current and former prisoners by investing in this critical yet overlooked research area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m14-2161

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review identified pitfalls to research on decarceration and specifically the lack of institutional investment in this work.

    “Our review also identified pitfalls to research on decarceration and specifically the lack of institutional investment in this work.78”

    From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Results section (page unavailable) documents low NIH investment in criminal justice health research, supporting the point about limited institutional investment. It does not establish a lack of investment specifically in decarceration research. “Our review” refers to the citing authors’ own work, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]National Research Council and Institute of Medicine Health and Incarceration: A Workshop Summary. A. Smith, Rapporteur Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education and Board on the Health of Select Populations, Institute of Medicine Washington, DC The National Academies Press 2013 24851307
  2. [57]Fields G Phillips EE The new asylums: Jails swell with mentally ill The Wall Street Journal 9 25 2013 A1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahalt, C., Bolano, M., Wang, E. A., & Williams, B.
Affiliations
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
162
Issue
5
Pages
345-352
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2086202579
Cited by
67
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
19.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG033102, T35AG026736, P30AG044281)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
NIH funding, incarcerated individuals, health disparities research, federal research funding, substance use, HIV, mental health, medically underserved populations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Financing, Government, Health Services Research, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Prisons, United States, HIV Infections, Adolescent Health Services, Substance-Related Disorders, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review