Cited by 8Efficiency Analysis Using DEAAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Economics and Policy

Farm Advisory Services and total factor productivity growth in the Irish dairy sector

Parikoglou, Iordanis, Emvalomatis, Grigorios, Thorne, Fiona, Wallace, Michael·2023·European Review of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of the engagement of individual farmers with Farm Advisory Services (FAS) on total factor productivity (TFP) growth, as a relevant indicator of competitiveness under the vision of sustainable intensification. Using farm-level data from the Irish dairy sector between 2008 and 2017, we estimate a random-coefficients stochastic frontier model and construct a TFP growth index, extending Orea (2002) such that the contribution of FAS becomes an additional component of the index. The results indicate that the main driver of TFP growth was technical change and efficiency gains; a negative scale effect slowed down TFP growth, but this impact was counteracted by the positive contribution of FAS to productivity growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/erae/jbac024

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Boyle, G. (2012). Enhancing Irish agricultural productivity through technology adoption: 1 A critique of the Irish Agricultural, Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS), in: 2 Heanue, K., Macken-Walsh, A., Maher, P. (Eds.), Teagasc Best Practise in Extension 3 Services - Supporting Farmer Innovation . Teagasc. 4
  2. Conradt, S., Bokusheva, R., Finger, R., and Kussaiynov, T. (2014). Yield trend estimation in the presence of farm heterogeneity and non-linear technological change. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 53, 1-20.
  3. FAO (2013). Integrated Crop Management Vol. 20-2013, Mechanization for Rural Devel12 opment: A review of patterns and progress from around the world . accessed 27 March, 13 2021. url : http://www.fao.org/3/i3259e/i3259e.pdf . 14
  4. Koop, G. (2003). Bayesian Econometrics . John Wiley and Sons. 16

Authors
Parikoglou, I., Emvalomatis, G., Thorne, F., & Wallace, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Parikoglou, Iordanis
Venue
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2022-10-13
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
655-682
ISSN
  • 0165-1587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3618
OpenAlex
W4304890625
Cited by
8
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Review of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Keywords
agricultural extension, total factor productivity growth, dairy farming, sustainable intensification, technological change, technical efficiency, scale effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review