The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Crop Yields and Global Food Security. Will Yield Increase Continue to Feed the World?
Open accessAbstract
Tony Fischer, Derek Beyerlee and Greg Edmeades jointly represent more than 100 years of expertise in agronomy, crop physiology and agricultural economics. They served many different international institutions but have a career at the International Wheat and Maize Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) in common. These three distinguished scientists put together a great book summarising and reviewing the developments in crop yields and their effect on global food security. As the sub-title of the book reveals, they also look ahead into the next decades. The book has been written in the context of the question whether progress in crop yield is sufficient to meet the future demand for staple crops (i.e. an estimated 60 per cent higher in 2050 than in 2010) without substantial increases in real prices. After an introduction of this question and definitions of the key concepts, the book reviews the progress in yields of the world's major commodities. Wheat, rice, maize and soybean are treated in separate chapters, while other coarse grains (barley, sorghum and millet), pulses, rapeseed, peanuts, sunflower, sugarcane, sugar beet, cassava, oil palm, potato and sweet potato are elaborated in somewhat less detail (partly because much less data are available). Each commodity is addressed for its major mega-environments. A mega-environment is defined as a commodity-specific term, referring to broad areas facing similar agro-ecologies in terms of weather, abiotic and biotic stresses and cropping system requirements. For each mega-environment, representative regions are used as illustrations. As the book is highly quantitative in nature, the examples are by definition those regions for which data are available. This also implies that the book has some emphasis on regions from the western world and from Asia, while Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is under-represented as detailed measurements of farm and potential yields are more scarce (or inaccurate) for this part of the world. That is of course an issue, as an important part of the increase in demand will occur in SSA. In the book both progress of on-farm yields (i.e. average actual farm yields) and potential yields (either irrigated or water-limited (rainfed)) are estimated. The first are derived from surveys and statistics and the latter from comparative or single variety experiments. Comparative variety experiments allow the assessment of genetic progress of potential yields by relating the measured yields in well-managed experiments (preferably avoiding any growth stress) to the year of release of the variety. As such the book heavily relies on observed data, which makes it a truly unique asset of observed farmers' and experimental yields. A drawback is that the book is somewhat idiosyncratic in using in a few cases own definitions, such as expressing the yield gap in relative deviations from farm yields. This is clearly different from the majority of the literature that expresses the yield gap as (a relative) deviation from the potential yield. This is not so convenient, as the potential yield is a much more typical and stable feature of an environment and it is more intuitive to compare yield gaps across the globe to express it as a percentage of the potential yield. Another limitation of the book is perhaps the downside of its strength. It relies heavily on experimental data, and hence the estimations of yield gaps may be somewhat conservative for those cases where good data on potential yields are lacking. For instance, experiments that approach potential yields are really scarce in some parts of the world, including SSA. After assessing yield gaps, the book continues with chapters about the causes of increases in potential yields (including the scope for further increases), climate change, resource use efficiency, trends in total factor productivity and policies. Although these chapters are clearly less comprehensive, they are helpful overviews. Finally, the book returns to the key question: will progress in crop yield be sufficient to meet the future demand for staple crops to avoid substantial increases in real prices? This question can be rephrased as: will crop yields (at farm level) linearly increase by at least 1.1 per cent per year (relative to 2010 yield)? Progress in farm yields depends on progress in potential yields and on closing the yield gap (the difference between potential and actual yields). Over the past decades, progress in potential yields had a larger contribution to increases in crop yields than closing the yield gaps (although with differences between crops). Of course the progress in potential yields has to go with the proper agronomy to harvest the greater potential. The authors conclude that looking ahead, the most feasible way to increase yields is to narrow the substantial yield gaps in some parts of the world. The book is a fantastic source of data on progress in actual and potential yields of the world's major food crops. It is also a clear text on
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cai, Y., Guan, K., Lobell, D., Potgieter, A. B., Wang, S., Peng, J., Xu, T., Asseng, S., Zhang, Y., You, L., et al. (2019) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.010 · Cited by 591
Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks
Tigchelaar, M., Battisti, D. S., Naylor, R. L., & Ray, D. K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1718031115 · Cited by 527
Improved prediction of fungal effector proteins from secretomes with EffectorP 2.0
Sperschneider, J., Dodds, P. N., Gardiner, D. M., Singh, K. B., & Taylor, J. M. (2018) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12682 · Cited by 403
Improving the monitoring of crop productivity using spaceborne solar‐induced fluorescence
Guan, K., Berry, J. A., Zhang, Y., Joiner, J., Guanter, L., Badgley, G., & Lobell, D. B. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13136 · Cited by 334
Circularity in animal production requires a change in the EAT-Lancet diet in Europe
van Selm, B., Frehner, A., de Boer, I. J. M., van Hal, O., Hijbeek, R., van Ittersum, M. K., Talsma, E. F., Lesschen, J. P., Hendriks, C. M. J., Herrero, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00425-3 · Cited by 125
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van Ittersum, M. K.
- Venue
- European Review of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-11-17
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-192
- ISSN
- 0165-1587 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3618
- OpenAlex
- W2179274650
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop Yields and Global Food Security. Will Yield Increase Continue to Feed the World? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/erae/jbv034
- The paper
- van Ittersum, M. K. (2016). Crop Yields and Global Food Security. Will Yield Increase Continue to Feed the World? European Review of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.