Cited by 175Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

How Do Changes in Gender Role Attitudes Towards Female Employment Influence Fertility? A Macro-Level Analysis

Open access
Arpino, Bruno, Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, Pessin, Léa·2015·European Sociological Review

Abstract

This study explores whether the diffusion of gender-equitable attitudes towards female employment is associated with fertility. We argue that any positive effect on fertility requires not only high levels of gender-equitable attitudes overall, but also attitude convergence between men and women. We analyse 27 countries using data from the World Values Surveys and European Values Studies. We find support for a U-shaped relationship between changes in gender role attitudes and fertility: an initial drop in fertility is observed as countries move from a traditional to a more gender-symmetric model. Beyond a certain threshold, additional increases in gender egalitarianism become positively associated with fertility. This curvi-linear relationship is moderated by the difference in attitudes between men and women: when there is more agreement, changes are more rapid and the effect of gender egalitarian attitudes on fertility strengthens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/esr/jcv002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Aassve, A. et al. (2014). What is your couple type? Gender Ideology, Household Work and Babies. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, Budapest, 25-28 June 2014.
  2. Ahn, N. and Mira, P. (2002) A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries, Journal of Population Economics, 15, 667-682.
  3. Arpino, B. and Tavares, L. P. (2013) Fertility and values in Italy and Spain: a look at regional differences within the European Context. Population Review, 52, 62-86.
  4. Azmat, G., Guell, M. and Manning, A. (2006) Gender gaps in unemployment rates in OECD countries. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 1-37.
  5. Badgett, L. and Folbre, N. (1999) Assigning care: gendernorms and economic outcomes. International Labour Review, 138, 311-326.
  6. Begall, K. and Mills, M. C. (2013). The influence of educational field, occupation, and occupational sex segregation on fertility in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 29, 720-742.
  7. Bongaarts, J. and Sobotka, T. (2012). A demographic explan- ation for the recent rise in European Fertility. Population and Development Review, 38, 83-120.
  8. Breen, R. and Cooke, L. P. (2005). The persistence of the gen- dered division of domestic labour. European Sociological Review, 21, 43-57.
  9. Castles, F. G. (2003) The world turned upside down: Below re- placement fertility, changing preferencesand family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13, 209-227.
  10. Chesnais, J.-C. (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary WesternEurope. Population and Development Review, 22, 729-739.
  11. Eeckhaut, M., Stanfors, M. A. and van de Putte, B. (2013). Educational heterogamy and the division of paid labour in the family:a comparison of present-day Belgium and Sweden. European Sociological Review, 3, 64-75.
  12. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles. Cambridge, UK; Malden, USA: Polity Press.
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. et al. (2013). Couple specialization in mul- tiple equilibria. European Sociological Review, 29, 1280-1294.
  14. Feichtinger, G. et al. (2013). Do egalitarian societies boost fertility? Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers, No. 2, available from: <http://hdl.handle.net/10419/ 96973>.
  15. Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour- market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 416-438.
  16. Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T. and Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of 'lowest-low' fertility? Population and Development Review, 35, 663-699.
  17. Hofa ¨cker, D., Stoilova, R. and Riebling, J. R. (2013). The gendered division of paid and unpaid work in different institu- tional regimes: comparing West Germany, East Germany and Bulgaria. European Sociological Review, 29, 192-209.
  18. Kohler, H-P., Billari, F. C. and Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emer- gence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28, 642-680.
  19. McDonald, P. (2000a). Gender equity in theories of fertility transi- tion. Population and Development Review, 26, 427-439.
  20. McDonald, P. (2000b). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17, 1-16.
  21. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: the efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32, 485-510.
  22. Saraceno, C. (2010). Social inequalities in facing old-age de- pendency: a bi-generational perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 32-44.

Authors
Arpino, B., Esping-Andersen, G., & Pessin, L.
Affiliations
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Arpino, Bruno
Venue
European Sociological Review
Published
2015-02-16
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
370-382
ISSN
  • 0266-7215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2672
OpenAlex
W2153832460
Cited by
175
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
FWCI
31.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Sociological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra
  • European Commission
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (269387)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
gender role attitudes, women's employment, fertility, gender egalitarianism, gender role change, U-shaped relationship, cross-national comparison, traditional gender roles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review