Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 932

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology

Open access
Corral-Acero, Jorge, Margara, Francesca, Marciniak, Maciej, Rodero, Cristobal, Loncaric, Filip, Feng, Yingjing, Gilbert, Andrew, Fernandes, Joao F, Bukhari, Hassaan A, Wajdan, Ali, Martinez, Manuel Villegas, Santos, Mariana Sousa, Shamohammdi, Mehrdad, Luo, Hongxing, Westphal, Philip, Leeson, Paul, DiAchille, Paolo, Gurev, Viatcheslav, Mayr, Manuel, Geris, Liesbet, Pathmanathan, Pras, Morrison, Tina, Cornelussen, Richard, Prinzen, Frits, Delhaas, Tammo, Doltra, Ada, Sitges, Marta, Vigmond, Edward J, Zacur, Ernesto, Grau, Vicente, Rodriguez, Blanca, Remme, Espen W, Niederer, Steven, Mortier, Peter, McLeod, Kristin, Potse, Mark, Pueyo, Esther, Bueno-Orovio, Alfonso, Lamata, Pablo·2020·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Providing therapies tailored to each patient is the vision of precision medicine, enabled by the increasing ability to capture extensive data about individual patients. In this position paper, we argue that the second enabling pillar towards this vision is the increasing power of computers and algorithms to learn, reason, and build the ‘digital twin’ of a patient. Computational models are boosting the capacity to draw diagnosis and prognosis, and future treatments will be tailored not only to current health status and data, but also to an accurate projection of the pathways to restore health by model predictions. The early steps of the digital twin in the area of cardiovascular medicine are reviewed in this article, together with a discussion of the challenges and opportunities ahead. We emphasize the synergies between mechanistic and statistical models in accelerating cardiovascular research and enabling the vision of precision medicine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 932

Metadata

Authors
Corral-Acero, J., Margara, F., Marciniak, M., Rodero, C., Loncaric, F., Feng, Y., Gilbert, A., Fernandes, J. F., Bukhari, H. A., Wajdan, A., Martinez, M. V., Santos, M. S., Shamohammdi, M., Luo, H., Westphal, P., Leeson, P., DiAchille, P., Gurev, V., Mayr, M., Geris, L., Pathmanathan, P., Morrison, T., Cornelussen, R., Prinzen, F., Delhaas, T., Doltra, A., Sitges, M., Vigmond, E. J., Zacur, E., Grau, V., Rodriguez, B., Remme, E. W., Niederer, S., Mortier, P., McLeod, K., Potse, M., Pueyo, E., Bueno-Orovio, A., & Lamata, P.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
41
Issue
48
Pages
4556-4564
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W3010152544
Cited by
932
References
11
FWCI
21.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159
The paper
Corral-Acero, J., Margara, F., Marciniak, M., Rodero, C., Loncaric, F., Feng, Y., Gilbert, A., Fernandes, J. F., Bukhari, H. A., Wajdan, A., Martinez, M. V., Santos, M. S., Shamohammdi, M., Luo, H., Westphal, P., Leeson, P., DiAchille, P., Gurev, V., Mayr, M., . . . Lamata, P. (2020). The ‘Digital Twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.