Cited by 530Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTechnology and Human Factors in Education and HealthDigital Transformation in Industry

Digital Twins: From Personalised Medicine to Precision Public Health

Open access
Kamel Boulos, Maged N., Zhang, Peng·2021·Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract

A digital twin is a virtual model of a physical entity, with dynamic, bi-directional links between the physical entity and its corresponding twin in the digital domain. Digital twins are increasingly used today in different industry sectors. Applied to medicine and public health, digital twin technology can drive a much-needed radical transformation of traditional electronic health/medical records (focusing on individuals) and their aggregates (covering populations) to make them ready for a new era of precision (and accuracy) medicine and public health. Digital twins enable learning and discovering new knowledge, new hypothesis generation and testing, and in silico experiments and comparisons. They are poised to play a key role in formulating highly personalised treatments and interventions in the future. This paper provides an overview of the technology’s history and main concepts. A number of application examples of digital twins for personalised medicine, public health, and smart healthy cities are presented, followed by a brief discussion of the key technical and other challenges involved in such applications, including ethical issues that arise when digital twins are applied to model humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jpm11080745

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthcare, digital twins are a promising tool for drug target discovery.

    “In healthcare, digital twins are a promising tool for drug target discovery 65,66 .”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [66]

    Section 3, “Digital Twins in Personalised Medicine” (page not provided), says digital twins are being explored for drug discovery and development. It does not specifically discuss discovering drug targets, so the claim is more specific than the source supports. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]Gelernter D. Mirror Worlds: Or the Day Software Puts the Universe in A Shoebox. How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 1993
  2. [4]Grieves M. Product Lifecycle Management: Driving the Next Generation of Lean Thinking: Driving the Next Generation of Lean Thinking: Driving the Next Generation of Lean Thinking McGraw Hill Education New York, NY, USA 2005
  3. [7]Grieves M. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication (Digital Twin White Paper-2004) Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275211047_Digital_Twin_Manufacturing_Excellence_through_Virtual_Factory_Replication (accessed on 2 July 2021)
  4. [8]Tao F. Liu W. Zhang M. Hu T. Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2019 25 1 18 10.13196/j.cims.2019.01.001 · DOI
  5. [46]Rao D.J. Mane S. Digital twin approach to clinical DSS with explainable AI-reducing subjectivity in liver disease diagnosis using domain knowledge and machine learning arXiv 2019 Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13520v1 (accessed on 2 July 2021) 1910.13520v1 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamel Boulos, M. N., & Zhang, P.
Affiliations
  • Information Management School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-29
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
745
ISSN
2075-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184569878
Cited by
530
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
digital twin, personalized medicine, precision public health, electronic health records, in silico analysis, ethical considerations, virtual human model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review