Cited by 441Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Remnant cholesterol predicts cardiovascular disease beyond LDL and ApoB: A primary prevention study

Open access
Quispe, Renato, Martin, Seth Shay, Michos, Erin Donelly, Lamba, Isha, Blumenthal, Roger Scott, Saeed, Anum, Lima, Joao, Puri, Rishi +7 more·2021·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Aims: Emerging evidence suggests that remnant cholesterol (RC) promotes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to estimate RC-related risk beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) in patients without known ASCVD. Methods and results: We pooled data from 17 532 ASCVD-free individuals from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (n = 9748), the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (n = 3049), and the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (n = 4735). RC was calculated as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) minus calculated LDL-C. Adjusted Cox models were used to estimate the risk for incident ASCVD associated with log RC levels. We also performed discordance analyses examining relative ASCVD risk in RC vs. LDL-C discordant/concordant groups using difference in percentile units (>10 units) and clinically relevant LDL-C targets. The mean age of participants was 52.3 ± 17.9 years, 56.7% were women and 34% black. There were 2143 ASCVD events over the median follow-up of 18.7 years. After multivariable adjustment including LDL-C and apoB, log RC was associated with higher ASCVD risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45–1.89]. Moreover, the discordant high RC/low LDL-C group, but not the low RC/high LDL-C group, was associated with increased ASCVD risk compared to the concordant group (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08–1.34). Similar results were shown when examining discordance across clinical cutpoints. Conclusions: In ASCVD-free individuals, elevated RC levels were associated with ASCVD independent of traditional risk factors, LDL-C, and apoB levels. The mechanisms of RC association with ASCVD, surprisingly beyond apoB, and the potential value of targeted RC-lowering in primary prevention need to be further investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab432

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quispe, R., Martin, S. S., Michos, E. D., Lamba, I., Blumenthal, R. S., Saeed, A., Lima, J., Puri, R., Nomura, S., Tsai, M., Wilkins, J., Ballantyne, C. M., Nicholls, S., Jones, S. R., & Elshazly, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, USA
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Elshazly, Mohamed Badreldin
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2021-07-19
Volume
42
Issue
42
Pages
4324-4332
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W3185962386
Cited by
441
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 8
FWCI
57.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (5T32HL007227)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, UL1-TR-001420)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Department of Health and Human Services (HHSN268201700001I, HHSN268201700002I, HHSN268201700003I, HHSN268201700005I, HHSN268201700004I)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (HHSN268201300025C, HHSN268201300026C)
  • Northwestern University (HHSN268201300027C)
  • University of Minnesota (HHSN268201300028C)
  • Kaiser Foundation Research Institute (HHSN268201300029C)
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (HHSN268200900041C)
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
remnant cholesterol, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, primary prevention, cardiovascular risk prediction, incident cardiovascular events
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Apolipoproteins B, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review