The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography (64-SCTA) compared with the standard reference conventional coronary angiography (CCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on a systematic search, 27 studies including 1740 patients were eligible for meta-analyses. Nineteen studies examined native coronary arteries (n = 1,251), four studies examined coronary artery by-pass grafts (CABG) (n = 271), and five studies examined coronary stents (n = 270). Overall 18 920 segments were assessable and 810 (4%) were unassessable. The prevalence of native coronary artery stenosis in per-segment (19 studies) and per-patients (13 studies) populations were 19 and 57.5% respectively. Accuracy tests with 95% confidence intervals comparing 64-SCTA vs. CCA showed that sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values for native coronary arteries were 86(85-87), 96(95.5-96.5), 83, and 96.5% by per-segment analysis; 97.5(96-99), 91(87.5-94), 93, and 96.5% by per-patient analysis; 98.5(96-99.5), 96(93.5-97.5), 92 and 99% for CABGs; 80(70-88.5), 95(92-97), 80, and 95% for stent restenosis; and 87(86.5-88), 96(95.5-96.5), 83.5, and 97% by overall per-segment analysis. CONCLUSION: The high diagnostic accuracy of 64-SCTA validates this non-invasive technique as a potential alternative to CCA in carefully selected populations suspected for coronary stenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Diamond, G. A., & Forrester, J. S. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197906143002402 · Cited by 2,664
Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data
Zamora, J., Abraira, V., Muriel, A., Khan, K., & Coomarasamy, A. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-31 · Cited by 1,883
Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries
de González, A. B., & Darby, S. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15433-0 · Cited by 1,718
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography
Raff, G. L., Gallagher, M. J., O’Neill, W. W., & Goldstein, J. A. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056 · Cited by 1,472
Einstein, A. J., Henzlova, M. J., & Rajagopalan, S. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.3.317 · Cited by 1,410
Budoff, M. J., Achenbach, S., Blumenthal, R. S., Carr, J. J., Goldin, J. G., Greenland, P., Guerci, A. D., Lima, J. A. C., Rader, D. J., Rubin, G. D., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.178458 · Cited by 1,398
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
Deeks, J. J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 · Cited by 1,340
Quantification of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Coronary Lesions by 64-Slice Computed Tomography
Leber, A. W., Knez, A., von Ziegler, F., Becker, A., Nikolaou, K., Paul, S., Wintersperger, B., Reiser, M., Becker, C. R., Steinbeck, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.071 · Cited by 1,109
Mollet, N. R., Cademartiri, F., van Mieghem, C. A. G., Runza, G., McFadden, E. P., Baks, T., Serruys, P. W., Krestin, G. P., & de Feyter, P. J. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.533471 · Cited by 1,018
Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience
Leschka, S., Alkadhi, H., Plass, A., Desbiolles, L., Grünenfelder, J., Marincek, B., & Wildermuth, S. (2005) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi261 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Hadamitzky, M., Freißmuth, B., Meyer, T., Hein, F., Kastrati, A., Martinoff, S., Schömig, A., & Hausleiter, J. (2009) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.11.015 · Cited by 280
Hadamitzky, M., Hein, F., Meyer, T., Bischoff, B., Martinoff, S., Schömig, A., & Hausleiter, J. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-2104 · Cited by 90
van Werkhoven, J. M., Gaemperli, O., Schuijf, J. D., Jukema, J. W., Kroft, L. J., Leschka, S., Alkadhi, H., Valenta, I., Pundziute, G., de Roos, A., et al. (2009) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.167353 · Cited by 52
Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in diabetic patients: a 5-year follow up study
Nadjiri, J., Hausleiter, J., Deseive, S., Will, A., Hendrich, E., Martinoff, S., & Hadamitzky, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0785-9 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdulla, J., Abildstrom, S. Z., Gotzsche, O., Christensen, E., Kober, L., & Torp-Pedersen, C.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3042-3050
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2157577400
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm466
- The paper
- Abdulla, J., Abildstrom, S. Z., Gotzsche, O., Christensen, E., Kober, L., & Torp-Pedersen, C. (2007). 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
