Cited by 487Cardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Running: the risk of coronary events: prevalence and prognostic relevance of coronary atherosclerosis in marathon runners

Mohlenkamp, S., Lehmann, N., Breuckmann, F., Brocker-Preuss, M., Nassenstein, K., Halle, M., Budde, T., Mann, K. +5 more·2008·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To quantify the prevalence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in marathon runners, and to study its role for myocardial damage and coronary events. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 108 apparently healthy male marathon runners aged >or=50 years, with >or=5 marathon competitions during the previous three years, the running history, Framingham risk score (FRS), CAC, and presence of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were measured. Control groups were matched by age (8:1) and FRS (2:1) from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. The FRS in marathon runners was lower than in age-matched controls (7 vs. 11%, P < 0.0001). However, the CAC distribution was similar in marathon runners and age-matched controls (median CAC: 36 vs. 38, P = 0.36) and higher in marathon runners than in FRS-matched controls (median CAC: 36 vs. 12, P = 0.02). CAC percentile values and number of marathons independently predicted the presence of LGE (prevalence = 12%) (P = 0.02 for both). During follow-up after 21.3 +/- 2.8 months, four runners with CAC >or= 100 experienced coronary events. Event-free survival was inversely related to CAC burden (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Conventional cardiovascular risk stratification underestimates the CAC burden in presumably healthy marathon runners. As CAC burden and frequent marathon running seem to correlate with subclinical myocardial damage, an increased awareness of a potentially higher than anticipated coronary risk is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn163

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies reported a higher CAC burden in healthy marathon runners compared to risk-factor matched non-athletes.

    “Previous studies have investigated the dose–response relationship between exercise and coronary artery disease and reported a higher CAC burden in healthy marathon runners compared to risk-factor matched non-athletes.2”
  • Studies differed in cardiovascular risk profiles in both athletes and controls.

    “studies differed in cardiovascular risk profiles in both athletes and controls.”
  • Smoking history was a non-negligible confounder in the papers by Molhenkamp et al. and Aengevaeren et al.

    “Smoking history was a non-negligible confounder in the papers by Molhenkamp et al. and Aengevaeren et al.2,4”
  • The final sample size of Master@Heart remains twice as large as that of previous studies.

    “the final sample size of the Master@Heart study remains twice as large as that of previous studies.2–4”
  • None of the Master@Heart study participants was taking antihypertensive drugs or statins.

    “none of the study participants was taking antihypertensive drugs or statins.2,4”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohlenkamp, S., Lehmann, N., Breuckmann, F., Brocker-Preuss, M., Nassenstein, K., Halle, M., Budde, T., Mann, K., Barkhausen, J., Heusch, G., Jockel, K.-H., Erbel, R., & on behalf of the Marathon Study Investigators and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigators
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Alfried Krupp Hospital (DE)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2008-07-10
Volume
29
Issue
15
Pages
1903-1910
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2146807074
Cited by
487
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Heinz Nixdorf Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
marathon running, coronary artery calcification, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk stratification, late gadolinium enhancement, myocardial injury, coronary events, cardiovascular risk factors, event-free survival
MeSH terms
Aged, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetic Angiopathies, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Endurance, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Running, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Prevalence, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review