The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: There is no cure for pulmonary arterial hypertension, but current approved treatment options include prostanoids, endothelin-receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors. The effect on survival of these compounds has not been appropriately assessed in individual trials because of small sample size and short duration. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials with drugs published in this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: Trials were searched in the Medline database from January 1990 to October 2008. The primary analysis included only studies with a placebo comparator arm, the sensitivity analysis also included studies comparing two active treatment arms. The main outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Twenty-one trials were included in the primary analysis (3140 patients) and two additional studies (59 patients) were included in the sensitivity analysis. Average duration of the trials was 14.3 weeks. All-cause mortality rate in the control group was 3.8%. Active treatments were associated with a reduction in mortality of 43% (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.35-0.92; P = 0.023); the sensitivity analysis confirmed a reduction in mortality of 38% (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-1.00; P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest an improvement of survival in the patients treated with the targeted therapies approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1
GREENLAND, S. (1987) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298 · Cited by 1,644 · cited 1×
“When studies did not directly supply the standard error of the mean (SEM) for the calculation of effect size, it was estimated from the published data.(39) When either the values at the end of follow-up or the SEM were not reported in the article, they were manually calculated from figures (if available).”
MethodMuch ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events
Bradburn, M. J., Deeks, J. J., Berlin, J. A., & Russell Localio, A. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2528 · Cited by 938
The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Kaptchuk, T. J. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00347-4 · Cited by 595
Cited by
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension
Galiè, N., Humbert, M., Vachiery, J.-L., Gibbs, S., Lang, I., Torbicki, A., Simonneau, G., Peacock, A., Vonk Noordegraaf, A., Beghetti, M., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317 · Cited by 6,931
Self-citationBenza, R. L., Miller, D. P., Gomberg-Maitland, M., Frantz, R. P., Foreman, A. J., Coffey, C. S., Frost, A., Barst, R. J., Badesch, D. B., Elliott, C. G., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.898122 · Cited by 1,547
Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Ghofrani, H.-A., Galiè, N., Grimminger, F., Grünig, E., Humbert, M., Jing, Z.-C., Keogh, A. M., Langleben, D., Kilama, M. O., Fritsch, A., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1209655 · Cited by 1,346
Self-citationRisk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Galiè, N., Channick, R. N., Frantz, R. P., Grünig, E., Jing, Z. C., Moiseeva, O., Preston, I. R., Pulido, T., Safdar, Z., Tamura, Y., et al. (2019) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01889-2018 · Cited by 819
van de Veerdonk, M. C., Kind, T., Marcus, J. T., Mauritz, G.-J., Heymans, M. W., Bogaard, H.-J., Boonstra, A., Marques, K. M. J., Westerhof, N., & Vonk-Noordegraaf, A. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.068 · Cited by 846
Metadata
- Authors
- Galie, N., Manes, A., Negro, L., Palazzini, M., Bacchi-Reggiani, M. L., & Branzi, A.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-09-27
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 394-403
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2090878184
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp022
- The paper
- Galie, N., Manes, A., Negro, L., Palazzini, M., Bacchi-Reggiani, M. L., & Branzi, A. (2008). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.