Cited by 303Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint

Open access
Scherr, Daniel, Khairy, Paul, Miyazaki, Shinsuke, Aurillac-Lavignolle, Valerie, Pascale, Patrizio, Wilton, Stephen B., Ramoul, Khaled, Komatsu, Yuki +19 more·2015·Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine 5-year efficacy of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using AF termination as a procedural end point. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (57±10 years) underwent persistent AF ablation using a stepwise ablation approach (pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram-guided, and linear ablation) with the desired procedural end point being AF termination. Repeat ablation was performed for recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia. AF was terminated by ablation in 120 patients (80%). Arrhythmia-free survival rates after a single procedure were 35.3%±3.9%, 28.0%±3.7%, and 16.8%±3.2% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Arrhythmia-free survival rates after the last procedure (mean 2.1±1.0 procedures) were 89.7%±2.5%, 79.8%±3.4%, and 62.9%±4.5%, at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. During a median follow-up of 58 (interquartile range, 43-73) months after the last ablation procedure, 97 of 150 (64.7%) patients remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. Another 14 (9.3%) patients maintained sinus rhythm after reinitiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, and an additional 15 (10.0%) patients regressed to paroxysmal recurrences only. Failure to terminate AF during the index procedure (hazard ratio 3.831; 95% confidence interval, 2.070-7.143; P<0.001), left atrial diameter≥50 mm (hazard ratio 2.083; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-4.016; P=0.03), continuous AF duration≥18 months (hazard ratio 1.984; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.846; P<0.04), and structural heart disease (hazard ratio 1.874; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-3.388; P=0.04) predicted arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, an ablation strategy aiming at AF termination is associated with freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in the majority of patients over a 5-year follow-up period. Procedural AF nontermination and specific baseline factors predict long-term outcome after ablation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.114.001943

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Calkins H, Kuck KH,Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2012;14:528-606.
  2. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Frye RL, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Klein WW, Lévy S, McNamara RL, PrystowskyEN, Wann LS, Wyse DG. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2001;104:2118- 2150.
  3. Haïssaguerre M, Sanders P, Hocini M, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Sacher F, Rostock T, Hsu LF, Bordachar P, Reuter S, Roudaut R, Clémenty J, Jaïs P. Catheter ablation of long- lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:1125-1137.
  4. Haïssaguerre M, Hocini M, Sanders P, Sacher F, Rotter M, Takahashi Y, Rostock T, Hsu LF, Bordachar P, Reuter S, Roudaut R, Clémenty J, Jaïs P. Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:1138-1147.
  5. O'Neill MD, Wright M, Knecht S, Jaïs P, Hocini M, Takahashi Y, Jönsson A, Sacher F, Matsuo S, Lim KT, Arantes L, Derval N, Lellouche N, Nault I, Bordachar P, Clémenty J, Haïssaguerre M. Long-term follow-up of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using termination as a procedural endpoint. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:1105-1112.
  6. Hocini M, Nault I, Wright M, Veenhuyzen G, Narayan SM, Jaïs P, Lim KT, Knecht S, Matsuo S, Forclaz A, Miyazaki S, Jadidi A, O'Neill MD, Sacher F, Clémenty J, Haïssaguerre M. Disparate evolution of right and left atrial rate during ablation of long- lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1007-1016.
  7. Dallas, TX 75231 is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology published online December 20, 2014; Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. http://circep.ahajournals.org/content/early/2014/12/20/CIRCEP.114.001943 World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the http://circep.ahajournals.org/content/suppl/2014/12/20/CIRCEP.114.001943.DC1.html Data Supplement (unedited) at: http://circep.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/ is online at: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Information about subscribing to Subscriptions: http://www.lww.com/reprints Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints: document. Permissions and Rights Question and Answer information about this process is available in the requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherr, D., Khairy, P., Miyazaki, S., Aurillac-Lavignolle, V., Pascale, P., Wilton, S. B., Ramoul, K., Komatsu, Y., Roten, L., Jadidi, A., Linton, N., Pedersen, M., Daly, M., O’Neill, M., Knecht, S., Weerasooriya, R., Rostock, T., Manninger, M., Cochet, H., Shah, A. J., Yeim, S., Denis, A., Derval, N., Hocini, M., Sacher, F., Haissaguerre, M., & Jais, P.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque (FR)
  • From the Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, Université Victor-Segalen Bordeaux, Pessac, France (D.S., P.K., S.M., V.A.-L., P.P., S.B.W., K.R., Y.K., L.R., A.J., N.L., M.P., M.D., M.O’N., S.K., R.W., T.R., H.C., A.J.S., S.Y., A.D., N.D., M.H., F.S., M.H., P.J.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria (D.S., M.M.).
Venue
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2015-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
18-24
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2106377001
Cited by
303
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 20
FWCI
22.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
persistent atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablation, arrhythmia-free survival, repeat ablation, left atrial diameter, structural heart disease, atrial tachycardia, long-term outcomes, procedural endpoint, antiarrhythmic drugs, sinus rhythm
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Pulmonary Veins, Recurrence, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Disease-Free Survival, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review