Cited by 199Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Resolving inequalities in care? Reduced mortality in the elderly after acute coronary syndromes. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project 2003–2010

Open access
Gale, C. P., Cattle, B. A., Woolston, A., Baxter, P. D., West, T. H., Simms, A. D., Blaxill, J., Greenwood, D. C. +2 more·2012·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To examine age-dependent in-hospital mortality for hospitalization with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in England and Wales. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mixed-effects regression analysis using data from 616 011 ACS events at 255 hospitals as recorded in the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP) 2003-2010; 102 415 (16.7%) patients were aged <55 years and 72 721 (11.9%) ≥85 years. Patients ≥85 years with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were less likely to receive emergency reperfusion therapy than those <55 years (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.25-0.28). Older patients had greater lengths of stay (P< 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (P< 0.001). For STEMI and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), there were reductions in in-hospital mortality from 2003 to 2010 across all age groups including the very elderly. For STEMI ≥ 85 years, in-hospital mortality reduced from 30.1% in 2003 to 19.4% in 2010 (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.75, P< 0.001), and for NSTEMI ≥ 85 years, from 31.5% in 2003 to 20.4% in 2010 (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.73, P< 0.001). Findings were upheld after multi-level adjustment (base = 2003): male STEMI 2010 OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.75; female STEMI 2010 OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42-0.71; male NSTEMI OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.42-0.60; female NSTEMI OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.40-0.59. CONCLUSION: For patients hospitalized with ACS in England and Wales, there have been substantial reductions in in-hospital mortality rates from 2003 to 2010 across all age groups. The temporal improvements in mortality were similar for sex and type of acute myocardial infarction. Age-dependent inequalities in the management of ACS were apparent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr381

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coronary care has improved for older adults, with improving prognosis after a first MI.

    “Coronary care has also been improved for older adults, with improving prognosis after the first MI. 320”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [320]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fox KAA, Steg PG, Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Anderson FA, Granger CB, Flather MD, Budaj A, Quill A, Gore JM, for the GRACE Investigators. Decline in Rates of Death and Heart Failure in Acute Coronary Syndromes, 1999-2006. JAMA: The Journal Of The American Medical Association 2007;297(17):1892- 1900.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gale, C. P., Cattle, B. A., Woolston, A., Baxter, P. D., West, T. H., Simms, A. D., Blaxill, J., Greenwood, D. C., Fox, K. A. A., & West, R. M.
Affiliations
  • York Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Gale, C. P.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
630-639
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2158181085
Cited by
199
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR/CS/009/004)
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/07/057/23215)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
acute coronary syndrome, in-hospital mortality, very elderly patients, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, length of hospital stay, Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, sex differences in mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Medical Audit, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Wales, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Thrombolytic Therapy, Hospital Mortality, Age Distribution, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review