Cited by 190Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Coronary artery disease severity and aortic stenosis: clinical outcomes according to SYNTAX score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Open access
Stefanini, Giulio G., Stortecky, Stefan, Cao, Davide, Rat-Wirtzler, Julie, O'Sullivan, Crochan J., Gloekler, Steffen, Buellesfeld, Lutz, Khattab, Ahmed A. +8 more·2014·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether coronary artery disease (CAD) severity exerts a gradient of risk in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 445 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI were included into a prospective registry between 2007 and 2012. The preoperative SYNTAX score (SS) was determined from baseline coronary angiograms. In case of revascularization prior to TAVI, residual SS (rSS) was also determined. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients without CAD (n = 158), patients with low SS (0-22, n = 207), and patients with high SS (SS > 22, n = 80). The pre-specified primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI). At 1 year, CAD severity was associated with higher rates of the primary endpoint (no CAD: 12.5%, low SS: 16.1%, high SS: 29.6%; P = 0.016). This was driven by differences in cardiovascular mortality (no CAD: 8.6%, low SS: 13.6%, high SS: 20.4%; P = 0.029), whereas the risk of stroke (no CAD: 5.1%, low SS: 3.3%, high SS: 6.7%; P = 0.79) and MI (no CAD: 1.5%, low SS: 1.1%, high SS: 4.0%; P = 0.54) was similar across the three groups. Patients with high SS received less complete revascularization as indicated by a higher rSS (21.2 ± 12.0 vs. 4.0 ± 4.4, P < 0.001) compared with patients with low SS. High rSS tertile (> 14) was associated with higher rates of the primary endpoint at 1 year (no CAD:12.5%, low rSS: 16.5%, high rSS: 26.3%, P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Severity of CAD appears to be associated with impaired clinical outcomes at 1 year after TAVI. Patients with SS > 22 receive less complete revascularization and have a higher risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, or MI than patients without CAD or low SS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu074

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The way coronary disease should influence decisions between TAVR and surgical valve replacement is unclear in some scenarios.

    “The way in which coronary disease should influence decisions between valve replacement with TAVR versus surgical valve replacement is also unclear in some scenarios.”

    From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [248]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says it is debated whether the extent and complexity of coronary artery disease affect outcomes after TAVI, and contrasts TAVI patients with those undergoing surgical replacement. It does not directly address how coronary disease should determine the choice between TAVI and surgery; its stated uncertainty concerns outcomes and revascularization strategy among TAVI patients. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stefanini, G. G., Stortecky, S., Cao, D., Rat-Wirtzler, J., O'Sullivan, C. J., Gloekler, S., Buellesfeld, L., Khattab, A. A., Nietlispach, F., Pilgrim, T., Huber, C., Carrel, T., Meier, B., Jüni, P., Wenaweser, P., & Windecker, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2014-03-28
Volume
35
Issue
37
Pages
2530-2540
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2146250153
Cited by
190
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Bern
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (140336, 135807, 33CM30-140 336, 32003B)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
coronary artery disease severity, aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, SYNTAX score, residual SYNTAX score, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, composite endpoints, risk stratification, coronary angiography, preoperative risk assessment, postoperative outcomes, transcatheter aortic valve
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review