Cited by 130Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

Differential blood pressure effects of ibuprofen, naproxen, and celecoxib in patients with arthritis: the PRECISION-ABPM (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety Versus Ibuprofen or Naproxen Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement) Trial

Open access
Ruschitzka, Frank, Borer, Jeffrey S, Krum, Henry, Flammer, Andreas J, Yeomans, Neville D, Libby, Peter, Lüscher, Thomas F, Solomon, Daniel H +10 more·2017·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Aims: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), both non-selective and selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, are among the most widely prescribed drugs worldwide, but associate with increased blood pressure (BP) and adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. PRECISION-ABPM, a substudy of PRECISION was conducted at 60 sites, to determine BP effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib vs. the non-selective NSAIDs naproxen and ibuprofen. Methods and results: In this double-blind, randomized, multicentre non-inferiority CV-safety trial, 444 patients (mean age 62 ± 10 years, 54% female) with osteoarthritis (92%) or rheumatoid arthritis (8%) and evidence of or at increased risk for coronary artery disease received celecoxib (100–200 mg bid), ibuprofen (600–800 mg tid), or naproxen (375–500 mg bid) with matching placebos in a 1: 1: 1 allocation, to assess the effect on 24-h ambulatory BP after 4 months. The change in mean 24-h systolic BP (SBP) in celecoxib, ibuprofen and naproxen-treated patients was -0.3 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI), −2.25, 1.74], 3.7 (95% CI, 1.72, 5.58) and 1.6 mmHg (95% CI, −0.40, 3.57), respectively. These changes resulted in a difference of − 3.9 mmHg (P = 0.0009) between celecoxib and ibuprofen, of − 1.8 mmHg (P = 0.12) between celecoxib and naproxen, and of − 2.1 mmHg (P = 0.08) between naproxen and ibuprofen. The percentage of patients with normal baseline BP who developed hypertension (mean 24-h SBP ≥ 130 and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg) was 23.2% for ibuprofen, 19.0% for naproxen, and 10.3% for celecoxib (odds ratio 0.39, P = 0.004 and odds ratio 0.49, P = 0.03 vs. ibuprofen and naproxen, respectively). Conclusions: In PRECISION-ABPM, allocation to the non-selective NSAID ibuprofen, compared with the COX-2 selective inhibitor celecoxib was associated with a significant increase of SBP, and a higher incidence of new-onset hypertension. ClinicalTrials: gov number NCT00346216

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx508

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruschitzka, F., Borer, J. S., Krum, H., Flammer, A. J., Yeomans, N. D., Libby, P., Lüscher, T. F., Solomon, D. H., Husni, M. E., Graham, D. Y., Davey, D. A., Wisniewski, L. M., Menon, V., Fayyad, R., Beckerman, B., Iorga, D., Lincoff, A. M., & Nissen, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • State University of New York (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ruschitzka, Frank
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2017-08-28
Volume
38
Issue
44
Pages
3282-3292
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2787676533
Cited by
130
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Keywords
blood pressure effects, celecoxib, ibuprofen, naproxen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, COX-2 inhibitors, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, hypertension, cardiovascular safety, coronary artery disease risk, PRECISION trial, non-inferiority, non-selective NSAIDs
MeSH terms
Celecoxib, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Blood Pressure, Coronary Artery Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Ibuprofen, Male, Naproxen, Osteoarthritis, Prospective Studies, Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review