Cited by 63Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesEicosanoids and Hypertension PharmacologyRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

Influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on renal function and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure-reducing effects of enalapril and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system in hypertensive patients

Pol??nia, Jorge, Boaventura, Isabel, Gama, Guilherme, Cam??es, Isabel, Bernardo, F??tima, Andrade, Paulo, Nunes, Jos?? P., Brand??o, Fernando +1 more·1995·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; aspirin and indomethacin) on the renal and antihypertensive effects of enalapril and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in patients with essential hypertension. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a crossover study, 18 patients on an unrestricted-salt diet were randomly assigned to receive either enalapril (20-40 mg/day) or nifedipine-GITS (30-60 mg/day) for 4-8 weeks, followed by aspirin (100 mg/day for 2 weeks) and then indomethacin (75 mg/day for 1 week). Blood pressure was measured by 24h ambulatory monitoring. RESULTS: Enalapril and nifedipine-GITS significantly reduced blood pressure compared with placebo. Aspirin did not alter the antihypertensive effect of either drug. Indomethacin attenuated (by 45%) the antihypertensive effect of enalapril throughout the 24h period of evaluation, but did not interfere with the effect of nifedipine. Furthermore, indomethacin significantly reduced the fractional excretion of sodium and plasma levels of prostaglandins in a similar way when added to either the enalapril or the nifedipine regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Vasodilatory prostaglandins are probably involved in the antihypertensive effects of enalapril but not of nifedipine, and this interaction seems to be independent of any indomethacin-induced decrease in renal sodium excretion. Nifedipine may be an appropriate drug to treat hypertensive patients requiring concomitant therapy with NSAID.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004872-199508000-00014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pol??nia, J., Boaventura, I., Gama, G., Cam??es, I., Bernardo, F., Andrade, P., Nunes, J. P., Brand??o, F., & Cerqueira-Gomes, M.
Affiliations
Hospital de São João (PT)
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
1995-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
925-931
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982621997
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, indomethacin, aspirin, enalapril, essential hypertension, antihypertensive drug interactions, renal function, fractional excretion of sodium, prostaglandins, ambulatory blood pressure
MeSH terms
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Blood Pressure, Drug Interactions, Enalapril, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Nifedipine, Cross-Over Studies, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review