Cited by 15Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Major gaps in the information provided to patients before implantation of cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective patient European evaluation

Open access
Januszkiewicz, Łukasz, Barra, Sérgio, Marijon, Eloi, Providencia, Rui, de Asmundis, Carlo, Chun, Julian K R, Farkowski, Michał M, Conte, Giulio +1 more·2023·EP Europace

Abstract

AIMS: Information provided to patients prior to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion and their participation in the decision-making process are crucial for understanding ICD function and accepting this lifelong therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the extent to which different aspects related to ICD and quality of life were transmitted to patients prior to ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, multicenter European study with an online questionnaire initiated by the European Heart Rhythm Association. The questionnaire was filled-in directly and personally by the ICD patients who were invited to participate. A total of 1809 patients (majority in their 40s-70s, with 624 women, 34.5%) from 10 European countries participated in the study. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (interquartile range 2-10). Overall, 1155 patients (71.5%) felt optimally informed at the time of device implantation, however many respondents received no information about ICD-related complications (n = 801, 49.6%), driving restrictions (n = 718, 44.5%), and possibility of end-of-life ICD deactivation (n = 408, 25.4%). Of note, women were less frequently involved in the decision-making process than men (47.3% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.003) and reported to be less often optimally informed before ICD implantation than men (61.2% vs. 76.8%, P < 0.001). More women mentioned the desire to have learned more about ICD therapy and the benefit/risk balance (45.4% vs. 33.7% of men; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This patient-based evaluation provides alarming findings on the lack of information provided to patients prior ICD implantation, particularly for women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euac275This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on ICD patients' needs and preferences point towards the need for increased focus on psychological support, regular feedback, and continuity in care.

    “Studies on ICD patients’ needs and preferences also point towards the need for increased focus on psychological support, regular feedback, and continuity in care.12,13”

    From Efficacy of a web-based healthcare innovation to advance the quality of life and care of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ACQUIRE-ICD): A randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results report that fewer than a third of patients were offered psychological support after implantation. The Discussion calls for better physician–patient communication and discusses continued communication about ICD deactivation, but it does not establish a need for regular feedback or continuity in care more broadly. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Januszkiewicz, Ł., Barra, S., Marijon, E., Providencia, R., de Asmundis, C., Chun, J. K. R., Farkowski, M. M., Conte, G., & Boveda, S.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrabida , V. N. Gaia , Portugal
  • University of Paris , Paris , France
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
  • Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel—Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels , Belgium
  • CCB, Cardiology, Med. Klinik III, Markuskrankenhaus , Frankfurt , Germany
  • Institute of Cardiology (PL)
  • Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino (CH)
  • Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur , 31076 Toulouse , France
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2023-01-24
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
1144-1151
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W4317866598
Cited by
15
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patient information, informed consent, shared decision-making, sex differences, quality of life, ICD complications, driving restrictions, ICD deactivation, benefit-risk balance, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Electric Countershock, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review