Cited by 73Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Value of history-taking in syncope patients: in whom to suspect long QT syndrome?

Open access
Colman, Nancy, Bakker, Annemieke, Linzer, Mark, Reitsma, Johannes B., Wieling, Wouter, Wilde, Arthur A.M.·2009·EP Europace

Abstract

AIMS: Long QT syndrome (LQTS), a potentially fatal disorder, has to be distinguished from non-fatal conditions. Our aim was to investigate whether history-taking can be used in identifying patients likely to have LQTS. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the characteristics of a group of LQTS patients with syncope patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) and vasovagal patients younger than 40 years of age. Thirty-two LQTS patients were included. We included 113 patients at the ED and 69 vasovagal patients. Family history of syncope, sudden cardiac death, or cardiovascular disease was found more often in LQTS patients. Palpitations were the only symptom reported more often in this group. Syncope while supine, during emotional stress and associated with exercise was also more common among LQTS. Standing as a trigger was found more often in ED and vasovagal patients. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a family history for syncope and sudden cardiac death, palpitations as a symptom, supine syncope, syncope associated with exercise, and emotional stress place patients at higher risk for LQTS. These findings should alert physicians to the potentially life-threatening illness of LQTS, and act accordingly by obtaining an electrocardiogram and paying specific attention to the QT interval.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eup101

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention to triggers and presence of palpitations preceding syncope onset have been helpful in diagnosing an arrhythmic etiology.

    “Attention to the triggers and presence of palpitations preceding syncope onset have been helpful in diagnosing an arrhythmic etiology (315).”

    From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [315]

    The Conclusion (page not available) reports that palpitations before syncope and certain triggers are more common in patients with long QT syndrome and warrant further cardiac testing. The Usefulness in daily clinical practice section says these triggers should alert physicians to possible cardiac syncope. The paper supports using these features to raise suspicion, but does not establish that they diagnose arrhythmic causes of syncope generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Sarasin FP, Louis-Simonet M, Carballo D, Slama S, Rajeswaran A, Metzger JT et al. Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study. Am J Med 2001;111:177-84.
  2. Blanc J-J, L'Her C, Touiza A, Garo B, L'Her E, Mansourati E. Prospective evalu- ation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year period. Eur Heart J 2002;23:815 -20.
  3. Wieling W, Ganzeboom KS, Krediet CT, Grundmeijer HG, Wilde AAM, van Dijk JG. Initial diagnostic strategy in the case of transient losses of consciousness: the importance of the medical history. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003;147:849 -54.
  4. Schwartz PJ, Periti M, Malliani A. The long Q-T syndrome. Am Heart J 1975;89: 378 -90.
  5. Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, Tzivoni D, Locati EH, MacCluer J et al. The long QT syndrome: prospective longitudinal study of 328 families. Circulation 1991; 84:1136 -44.
  6. Wehrens XH, Vos MA, Doevendans PA, Wellens HJ. Novel insights in the congenital long QT syndrome. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:981 -92.
  7. Weintraub RG, Gow RM, Wilkinson JL. The congenital long QT syndromes in childhood. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:676-80.
  8. Vincent GM, Timothy KW, Leppert M, Keating M. The spectrum of symptoms and QT intervals in carriers of the gene for the long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:846 -52.
  9. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG, Bergfeldt L, Blanc JJ, Bloch Tomson PE et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope. Europace 2004;6:467 -537.
  10. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, Moss AJ, Vincent GM, Napolitano C et al. Genotype -phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific trig- gers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation 2001;103:89 -95.
  11. Wilde AAM, Jongbloed RJE, Doevendans PA, Duren DR, Hauer RN, van Langen IM et al. Auditory stimuli as a trigger for arrhythmic events differentiate HERG-related (LQTS2) patients from KVLQT1-related patients (LQTS1). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:327 -32.
  12. Schwartz PJ, Moss AJ, Vincent GM, Crampton RS. Diagnostic criteria for the long QT syndrome. Circulation 1993;88:782 -4.
  13. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Bradley J, Polonsky S, Peterson DR, McNitt S et al. Long-QT syndrome after age 40. Circulation 2008;117:2192 -201.
  14. Priori SG, Schwartz PJ, Napolitano C, Bloise R, Ronchetti E, Grillo M et al. Risk stratification in the long-QT syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1866 -74.
  15. Viskin S, Rosovski U, Sands J, Chen E, Kistler PM, Kalman JM et al. Inaccurate elec- trocardiographic interpretation of long QT: the majority of physicians cannot recognize a long QT when they see one. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:569 -74.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colman, N., Bakker, A., Linzer, M., Reitsma, J. B., Wieling, W., & Wilde, A. A. M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Wilde, Arthur A.M.
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2009-05-29
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
937-943
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2162798299
Cited by
73
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
long QT syndrome, syncope, vasovagal syncope, medical history, family history of sudden cardiac death, palpitations, exercise-induced syncope, emotional stress, emergency department patients, electrocardiogram, QT interval
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Syncope, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Incidence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review