CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,722Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 743 of the 743 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design

Open access
Calkins, Hugh, Kuck, Karl Heinz, Cappato, Riccardo, Brugada, Josep, Camm, A. John, Chen, Shih-Ann, Crijns, Harry J.G., Damiano, Ralph J., Davies, D. Wyn, DiMarco, John, Edgerton, James, Ellenbogen, Kenneth, Ezekowitz, Michael D., Haines, David E., Haissaguerre, Michel, Hindricks, Gerhard, Iesaka, Yoshito, Jackman, Warren, Jalife, Jose, Jais, Pierre, Kalman, Jonathan, Keane, David, Kim, Young-Hoon, Kirchhof, Paulus, Klein, George, Kottkamp, Hans, Kumagai, Koichiro, Lindsay, Bruce D., Mansour, Moussa, Marchlinski, Francis E., McCarthy, Patrick M., Mont, J. Lluis, Morady, Fred, Nademanee, Koonlawee, Nakagawa, Hiroshi, Natale, Andrea, Nattel, Stanley, Packer, Douglas L., Pappone, Carlo, Prystowsky, Eric, Raviele, Antonio, Reddy, Vivek, Ruskin, Jeremy N., Shemin, Richard J., Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Wilber∧, David, TASK FORCE MEMBERS:, Chairs:, Calkins, Hugh, Kuck, Karl Heinz, Cappato, Riccardo, Section Chairs: Atrial Fibrillation: Definitions, Mechanisms, and Rationale for Ablation—, Chen, Shih-Ann, Prystowsky, Eric N., Kuck, Karl Heinz, Natale, Andrea, Haines, David E., Marchlinski, Francis E., Calkins, Hugh, Davies, D. Wyn, Lindsay, Bruce D., Damiano, Ralph, Packer, Douglas L., Brugada, Josep, Camm, A. John, Crijns, Harry J.G., DiMarco, John, Edgerton, James, Ellenbogen, Kenneth, Ezekowitz, Michael D., Haissaguerre, Michel, Hindricks, Gerhard, Iesaka, Yoshito, Jackman, Warren M., Jais, Pierre, Jalife, José, Kalman, Jonathan, Keane, David, Kim, Young-Hoon, Kirchhof, Paulus, Klein, George, Kottkamp, Hans, Kumagai, Koichiro, Mansour, Moussa, Marchlinski, Francis, McCarthy, Patrick, Mont, J. Lluis, Morady, Fred, Nademanee, Koonlawee, Nakagawa, Hiroshi, Nattel, Stanley, Pappone, Carlo, Raviele, Antonio, Reddy, Vivek, Ruskin, Jeremy N., Shemin, Richard J., Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Wilber, David, Document reviewers:, Ad, Niv, Cummings, Jennifer, Gillinov, A. Mark, Heidbuchel, Hein, January, Craig, Lip, Gregory, Markowitz, Steven, Nair, Mohan, Ovsyshcher, I. Eli, Pak, Hui-Nam, Tsuchiya, Takeshi, Shah, Dipen, Siong, Teo Wee, Vardas, Panos E.·2012·Europace
DOI 10.1093/europace/eus027
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

During the past decade, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved rapidly from an investigational procedure to its current status as a commonly performed ablation procedure in many major hospitals throughout the world. Surgical ablation of AF, using either standard or minimally invasive techniques, is also performed in many major hospitals throughout the world. In 2007, an initial Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical AF Ablation was developed as a joint effort of the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society.1 The 2007 document was also developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American College of Cardiology. Since the publication of the 2007 document, there has been much learned about AF ablation, and the indications for these procedures have changed. Therefore the purpose of this 2012 Consensus Statement is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the field of catheter and surgical ablation of AF and to report the findings of a Task Force, convened by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society and charged with defining the indications, techniques, and outcomes of this procedure. Included within this document are recommendations pertinent to the design of clinical trials in the field of AF ablation, including definitions relevant to this topic. This statement summarizes the opinion of the Task Force members based on an extensive literature review as well as their own experience. It is directed to all health care professionals who are involved in the care of patients with AF, particularly those who are undergoing, or are being considered for, catheter or surgical ablation procedures for AF. This statement is not intended to recommend or promote catheter ablation of AF. Rather the ultimate judgment regarding care of a particular patient …

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eus027

Cites

743 of 743 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Items 401–600 of 743

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Platt M, 2004, Limiting the number and extent of radiofrequency applications to terminate atrial fibrillation and subsequently prevent its inducibility, Heart Rhythm., 1
  2. Nakagawa H, 2008, Ablation of Autonomic Ganglia, 218
  3. Swartz, 1994, A catheter based curative approach to atrial fibrillation in humans, Circulation., 90, 1
  4. Lin, 2004, Provocability of atrial fibrillation triggers during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with infrequent AF, Heart Rhythm., 2004, S231
  5. Schmidt, 2010, Toccata multi-center clinical study: long-term results, Heart Rhythm., 7
  6. Steinhaus, 2011, Medtronic Cardiac Ablation System P100008, Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel
  7. Lin YJ, 2011, A prospective, randomized, comparison of modified pulmonary vein isolation (target the AF nest) versus conventional pulmonary vein isolation in the catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Heart Rhythm., 8
  8. ASA, Statement on Granting Privileges for Administration of Moderate Sedation to Practitioners who are not Anesthesia Professionals
  9. Calkins, 2000, Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures, 793
  10. Guiraudon, 1985, Combined sinoatrial note atrioventricular node isolation: a surgical alternative to His bundle ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation, Circulation., 72, 220

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,722

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S.-A., Crijns, H. J. G., Damiano, R. J., Davies, D. W., DiMarco, J., Edgerton, J., Ellenbogen, K., Ezekowitz, M. D., Haines, D. E., Haissaguerre, M., Hindricks, G., Iesaka, Y., Jackman, W., Jalife, J., Jais, P., Kalman, J., Keane, D., Kim, Y.-H., Kirchhof, P., Klein, G., Kottkamp, H., Kumagai, K., Lindsay, B. D., Mansour, M., Marchlinski, F. E., McCarthy, P. M., Mont, J. L., Morady, F., Nademanee, K., Nakagawa, H., Natale, A., Nattel, S., Packer, D. L., Pappone, C., Prystowsky, E., Raviele, A., Reddy, V., Ruskin, J. N., Shemin, R. J., Tsao, H.-M., Wilber∧, D., TASK FORCE MEMBERS:, Chairs:, Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Section Chairs: Atrial Fibrillation: Definitions, M., Chen, S.-A., Prystowsky, E. N., Kuck, K. H., Natale, A., Haines, D. E., Marchlinski, F. E., Calkins, H., Davies, D. W., Lindsay, B. D., Damiano, R., Packer, D. L., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Crijns, H. J. G., DiMarco, J., Edgerton, J., Ellenbogen, K., Ezekowitz, M. D., Haissaguerre, M., Hindricks, G., Iesaka, Y., Jackman, W. M., Jais, P., Jalife, J., Kalman, J., Keane, D., Kim, Y.-H., Kirchhof, P., Klein, G., Kottkamp, H., Kumagai, K., Mansour, M., Marchlinski, F., McCarthy, P., Mont, J. L., Morady, F., Nademanee, K., Nakagawa, H., Nattel, S., Pappone, C., Raviele, A., Reddy, V., Ruskin, J. N., Shemin, R. J., Tsao, H.-M., Wilber, D., reviewers:, D., Ad, N., Cummings, J., Gillinov, A. M., Heidbuchel, H., January, C., Lip, G., Markowitz, S., Nair, M., Ovsyshcher, I. E., Pak, H.-N., Tsuchiya, T., Shah, D., Siong, T. W., & Vardas, P. E.
Affiliations
∧STS Representative
ORCID
Venue
Europace
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
528-606
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
DOI
10.1093/europace/eus027
OpenAlex
W2167850919
Cited by
2,722
References
743
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 205 · 2020: 292 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 211 · 2017: 281 · 2016: 269 · 2015: 326 · 2014: 325 · 2013: 305 · 2012: 119
FWCI
218.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, surgical ablation, minimally invasive cardiac surgery, patient selection, procedural technique, post-ablation follow-up, clinical trial design, ablation outcomes
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Clinical Trials as Topic, Follow-Up Studies, Germany, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Research Design, Catheter Ablation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Patient Selection, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review