Cited by 26Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Value of the aVR lead in differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Haghjoo, M., Bahramali, E., Sharifkazemi, M., Shahrzad, S., Peighambari, M.·2012·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: Despite the several electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria, misclassification may still occur in differential diagnosis of the regular paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the aVR lead in ECG differentiation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: A 12-lead ECG was recorded in 150 consecutive patients (96 women, mean age, 45 ± 13.5 years) with drug-refractory regular PSVT during both sinus rhythm and tachycardia. All ECGs were reviewed by two experienced electrophysiologists who had no knowledge of the tachycardia mechanism. The ECG recordings were evaluated for standard criteria as well as our newly proposed criterion of pseudo-r' in the lead aVR. Mechanism of arrhythmia was confirmed by the electrophysiological study and the successful catheter ablation. Patients with AVNRT were older (50 ± 10 vs. 37 ± 15 years, P = 0.001), predominantly female (71 vs. 53%, P = 0.03), and presented with slower tachycardia (175 ± 25 vs. 186 ± 26 b.p.m., P = 0.01). Among the ECG criteria of the AVRT diagnosis, visible P-wave with RP interval ≥ 100 ms had highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 79%, specificity 87%, and positive predictive value 79%). For AVNRT diagnosis, pseudo-r' in aVR had a higher sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values compared with the conventional criteria of the pseudo-r' in V1 and pseudo-s in inferior leads (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: New criterion of pseudo-r' in lead aVR appears to be more accurate than the standard ECG criteria for ECG diagnosis of AVNRT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eus109

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haghjoo, M., Bahramali, E., Sharifkazemi, M., Shahrzad, S., & Peighambari, M.
Affiliations
Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center (IR)
Corresponding author
Haghjoo, M.
Venue
Europace
Published
2012-04-29
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1624-1628
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2065317763
Cited by
26
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, lead aVR, electrocardiographic diagnosis, differential diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, catheter ablation
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Electrocardiography, Electrodes, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Catheter Ablation, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac, Tachycardia, Reciprocating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review