Cited by 30Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Utility of the aVL lead in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia

Open access
Di Toro, D., Hadid, C., Lopez, C., Fuselli, J., Luis, V., Labadet, C.·2009·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: Reciprocating atrioventricular tachycardia can be categorized into common slow-fast atrioventricular node re-entrant (AVNRT) and orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT). The electrocardiogram (ECG) during tachycardia is useful in distinguishing these two mechanisms. The presence of a pseudo-R'-wave in lead V1 or pseudo-S-wave in the inferior leads has been widely used, although the value of an isolated aVL lead has not been evaluated yet. To determine whether an isolated aVL lead of the surface 12-lead ECG is useful for the differential diagnosis between AVNRT and AVRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred for paroxysmal regular supraventricular tachycardia radiofrequency ablation were prospectively evaluated. Patients with atrial tachycardia, bundle branch block, manifested pre-excitation, and those undiagnosed after electrophysiology study were excluded. We compared the standard criteria with the value of an isolated aVL lead to distinguish between AVNRT and AVRT. One hundred and one patients were included; 73.3% were AVNRT and 26.7% AVRT. Patients with AVNRT were older (49.4 +/- 16.4 vs. 36.0 +/- 18.7 years, P = 0.001). The aVL notch and the standard criteria were found more frequently in AVNRT than in AVRT (aVL notch: 51.3 vs. 7.4%, P< or = 0.001; pseudo-S-wave 45 vs. 8.6% P = 0.001; and pseudo-R'-wave in V1 39.7 vs. 11.5%, P = 0.008, respectively). The aVL notch sensitivity and specificity to determine the final diagnosis were higher than the standard criteria (aVL notch 48.6 and 92.6%; pseudo-S-wave 45 and 91.3%; and pseudo-R'-wave in V1 39.7 and 88.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of a notch in aVL lead appeared to be as sensitive and specific as the standard electrocardiographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of AVNRT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eup130

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Toro, D., Hadid, C., Lopez, C., Fuselli, J., Luis, V., & Labadet, C.
Affiliations
  • Argerich Hospital (AR)
  • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR)
Venue
Europace
Published
2009-06-13
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
944-948
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2098798772
Cited by
30
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Queen's University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
electrocardiographic diagnosis, differential diagnosis, supraventricular tachycardia, radiofrequency ablation
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review