Cited by 93Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of the literature

Open access
Hohnloser, Stefan H., Camm, A. John·2013·EP Europace

Abstract

AIMS: To summarize and analyse the published literature on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran for anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A comprehensive search of the literature in the English language was conducted and 10 studies were identified which compared dabigatran therapy with warfarin. Data were extracted and meta-analysed using appropriate methodology. There was significant clinical heterogeneity among studies concerning study designs and methodologies. Most studies consisted of retrospective single-centre observational studies. A total of 3648 patients were included of whom 2241 were receiving warfarin and 1407 dabigatran. Only 12 thrombo-embolic events were reported, 3 during warfarin and 9 during dabigatran therapy [odds ratio (OR) 2.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-6.85, P = n.s.). The pooled rate of major bleeding events was similar for warfarin and for dabigatran (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.80; P = n.s.). Rates of minor bleeding events were also similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran has similar efficacy and safety compared with warfarin when used for periprocedural anticoagulation during AF ablation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eut241

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hohnloser, S. H., & Camm, A. J.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Hohnloser, Stefan H.
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2013-08-16
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1407-1411
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W1980921198
Cited by
93
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
dabigatran etexilate, atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, periprocedural anticoagulation, warfarin, thromboembolic events, major bleeding, minor bleeding, direct oral anticoagulants
MeSH terms
Dabigatran, Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Benzimidazoles, Hemorrhage, Humans, Pyridines, Risk Factors, Thromboembolism, Warfarin, Chi-Square Distribution, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review