The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: There has been large variations in the use of invasive electrophysiological therapies in the member countries of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). The aim of this analysis was to provide comprehensive information on cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and catheter ablation therapy trends in the ESC countries over the last five years. METHODS: The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has collected data on CIED and catheter ablation therapy since 2008. Last year 49 of the 56 ESC member countries provided data for the EHRA White Book. This analysis is based on the current and previous editions of the EHRA White Book. Data on procedure rates together with information on economic aspects, local reimbursement systems and training activities are presented for each ESC country and the five geographical ESC regions. RESULTS: In 2013, the electrophysiological procedure rates per million population were highest in Western Europe followed by the Southern and Northern European countries. The CIED implantation and catheter ablation rate was lowest in the Eastern European and in the non-European ESC countries, respectively. However, in some Eastern European countries with relative low gross domestic product procedure rates exceeded those of some wealthier Western countries, suggesting that economic resources are not the only driver for utilization of arrhythmia therapies. CONCLUSION: These statistics indicate that despite significant improvements, there still is considerable heterogeneity in the availability of arrhythmia therapies across the ESC area. Hopefully, these data will help identify areas for improvement and guide future activities in cardiac arrhythmia management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Randomized Registry Trial — The Next Disruptive Technology in Clinical Research?
Lauer, M. S., & D'Agostino, R. B. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1310102 · Cited by 595
Cited by
Raatikainen, M. J. P., Arnar, D. O., Merkely, B., Nielsen, J. C., Hindricks, G., Heidbuchel, H., & Camm, J. (2017) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eux258 · Cited by 323
Self-citationBody image concerns in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a scoping review
Frydensberg, V. S., Skovbakke, S. J., Pedersen, S. S., & Kok, R. N. (2018) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.13421 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Raatikainen, M. J. P., Arnar, D. O., Zeppenfeld, K., Merino, J. L., Levya, F., Hindriks, G., & Kuck, K.-H.
- Venue
- Europace
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- i1-i75
- ISSN
- 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2092
- OpenAlex
- W2138951514
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/europace/euu300
- The paper
- Raatikainen, M. J. P., Arnar, D. O., Zeppenfeld, K., Merino, J. L., Levya, F., Hindriks, G., & Kuck, K.-H. (2015). Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.