Cited by 32Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Body image concerns in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a scoping review

Open access
Frydensberg, Vivi S., Skovbakke, Søren J., Pedersen, Susanne S., Kok, Robin N.·2018·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) retain a scar and a bump at the site of implant. This may lead to body image concerns (BICs) that influence patients' quality of life. Few studies have examined the prevalence and impact of BICs postimplant, prompting us to conduct a scoping review of the field. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cinahl databases in August 2016 and repeated in May 2017. Included were studies reporting on patients ≥ 18 years, an ICD implant (transvenous, subcutaneous, or ICD with cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT-D]), reporting on BICs, and published in peer-reviewed English-language journals. We excluded nonsystematic reviews, opinion pieces/letters, case studies, conference abstracts, PhD dissertations, protocol papers, studies of ICD shock treatment of atrial fibrillation, and of abdominally or submammary implanted ICDs. RESULTS: A total of 40 articles were included: 16 qualitative and 24 quantitative. None of the included studies had BICs as their primary endpoint. Results showed that BICs are present in various degrees in the ICD population and can be attributed to the visibility of the ICD (the scar and bump). Women and younger patients had greater problems with BICs, although men also had concerns. Two items of the "Florida Patient Acceptance Survey" were the most frequently used to assess BICs. CONCLUSION: BICs were present among ICD patients, but the degree of impact on their lives varied. There is a need for developing a BICs questionnaire to examine the prevalence of BICs and the potential impact on patients' lives in longitudinal studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pace.13421

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frydensberg, V. S., Skovbakke, S. J., Pedersen, S. S., & Kok, R. N.
Affiliations
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Pedersen, Susanne S.
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-06
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1235-1260
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W2808776372
Cited by
32
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, body image concern, quality of life, CRT-D, patient acceptance, sex differences, age differences, body image questionnaire
MeSH terms
Body Image, Cicatrix, Humans, Quality of Life, Defibrillators, Implantable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review