Cited by 17Sex and Gender in HealthcareHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Exploring gender and socioeconomic differences in treatment of coronary heart disease

Manderbacka, Kristiina·2005·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background Earlier studies on gender and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of coronary heart disease have focused mainly on structural features of the health-care system on the one hand and on coronary patients' psychosocial characteristics on the other. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to trace key points in the pathways of treatment where patients' experience varies and which can contribute to gender and socioeconomic differences in treatment. Methods The data consist of 30 interviews among persons diagnosed with or suspected to have coronary heart disease in the Health 2000, a representative cross-sectional interview and health examination survey. Purposive sampling was used to ensure variation in gender, socioeconomic status and disease severity. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Gender and socioeconomic differences were found in two key points in the pathways of treatment: doctor-patient interaction and the organization of primary care. The three features commonly distinguished in doctor-patient interaction, i.e. treatment decision-making, information exchange and interpersonal relationship, were all found to be relevant. A second key point was organization of primary care in terms of both access to examinations and care, and continuity of care. Conclusions These results should sensitize us to gender and socioeconomic differences in coronary patients' problems in access to and continuity of care, as well as to po…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/cki050

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manderbacka exploration of decision-making in relation to 'white collar' and 'blue collar' patients found that doctors were more likely to take a 'doctor-centred model' for communication, assessment and decision-making with patients from a 'blue collar' background but tended to adopt a 'person-centred and shared decision-making model' with 'white collar' background patients.

    “Manderbacka55 exploration of decision-making in relation to ‘white collar’ and ‘blue collar’ patients found that doctors were more likely to take a ‘doctor-centred model’ for communication, assessment and decision-making with patients from a ‘blue collar’ background but tended to adopt a ‘person-centred and shared decision-making model’ with ‘white collar’ background patients.”

Cites

Cited by

Authors
Manderbacka, K.
Corresponding author
Manderbacka, Kristiina
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
634-639
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2029174429
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
coronary artery disease, gender differences, socioeconomic status, treatment pathways, doctor-patient interaction, primary care organization, continuity of care, health care access, treatment decision-making, health information exchange, patient experience
MeSH terms
Aged, Continuity of Patient Care, Coronary Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, Finland, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, National Health Programs, Sex Factors, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review