Exploring gender and socioeconomic differences in treatment of coronary heart disease
Abstract
Background Earlier studies on gender and socioeconomic differences in the treatment of coronary heart disease have focused mainly on structural features of the health-care system on the one hand and on coronary patients' psychosocial characteristics on the other. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to trace key points in the pathways of treatment where patients' experience varies and which can contribute to gender and socioeconomic differences in treatment. Methods The data consist of 30 interviews among persons diagnosed with or suspected to have coronary heart disease in the Health 2000, a representative cross-sectional interview and health examination survey. Purposive sampling was used to ensure variation in gender, socioeconomic status and disease severity. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Gender and socioeconomic differences were found in two key points in the pathways of treatment: doctor-patient interaction and the organization of primary care. The three features commonly distinguished in doctor-patient interaction, i.e. treatment decision-making, information exchange and interpersonal relationship, were all found to be relevant. A second key point was organization of primary care in terms of both access to examinations and care, and continuity of care. Conclusions These results should sensitize us to gender and socioeconomic differences in coronary patients' problems in access to and continuity of care, as well as to po…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Manderbacka exploration of decision-making in relation to 'white collar' and 'blue collar' patients found that doctors were more likely to take a 'doctor-centred model' for communication, assessment and decision-making with patients from a 'blue collar' background but tended to adopt a 'person-centred and shared decision-making model' with 'white collar' background patients.
“Manderbacka55 exploration of decision-making in relation to ‘white collar’ and ‘blue collar’ patients found that doctors were more likely to take a ‘doctor-centred model’ for communication, assessment and decision-making with patients from a ‘blue collar’ background but tended to adopt a ‘person-centred and shared decision-making model’ with ‘white collar’ background patients.”
From Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Second Joint Task Force of European (1998) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1243 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Socioeconomic variations in responses to chest pain: qualitative study
Richards, H. M., Reid, M. E., & Watt, G. C. M. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7349.1308 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Job, C., Adenipekun, B., Cleves, A., Gill, P., & Samuriwo, R. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Manderbacka, K.
- Corresponding author
- Manderbacka, Kristiina
- Venue
- European Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 634-639
- ISSN
- 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-360X
- OpenAlex
- W2029174429
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, gender differences, socioeconomic status, treatment pathways, doctor-patient interaction, primary care organization, continuity of care, health care access, treatment decision-making, health information exchange, patient experience
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Continuity of Patient Care, Coronary Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, Finland, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, National Health Programs, Sex Factors, Social Class
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review