The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hearing impairment is a leading cause of disease burden, yet population-based studies that measure hearing impairment are rare. We estimate regional and global hearing impairment prevalence from sparse data and calculate corresponding uncertainty intervals. METHODS: We accessed papers from a published literature review and obtained additional detailed data tabulations from investigators. We estimated the prevalence of hearing impairment by region, sex, age and hearing level using a Bayesian hierarchical model, a method that is effective for sparse data. As the primary objective of modelling was to produce regional and global prevalence estimates, including for those regions with scarce to no data, models were evaluated using cross-validation. RESULTS: We used data from 42 studies, carried out between 1973 and 2010 in 29 countries. Hearing impairment was positively related to age, male sex and middle- and low-income regions. We estimated that the global prevalence of hearing impairment (defined as an average hearing level of 35 decibels or more in the better ear) in 2008 was 1.4% (95% uncertainty interval 1.0-2.2%) for children aged 5-14 years, 9.8% (7.7-13.2%) for females >15 years of age and 12.2% (9.7-16.2%) for males >15 years of age. The model exhibited good external validity in the cross-validation analysis, with 87% of survey estimates falling within our final model's 95% uncertainty intervals. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the prevalence of child and adult hearing impairment is substantially higher in middle- and low-income countries than in high-income countries, demonstrating the global need for attention to hearing impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Murray, 2007, Global Burden of Disease 2005: call for collaborators, Lancet, 370, 109, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61064-2 · DOI
- World Health Organization, 2008, The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update
- Davis, 2007, Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models, Health Technol Assess, 11, 1, 10.3310/hta11420 · DOI · Paper page
- Pascolini, 2009, Hearing Impairment in 2008: a compilation of available epidemiological studies, Int J Audiol, 48, 473, 10.1080/14992020902803120 · DOI
- McPherson, 2010, Hearing screening for school children: comparison of low-cost, computer-based and conventional audiometry, Child Care Health Dev, 36, 323, 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01079.x · DOI
- Gelman, 2007, Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Analytical Methods for Social Research
- Gelman, 2006, Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: what it can and cannot do, Technometrics, 48, 432, 10.1198/004017005000000661 · DOI · Paper page
- Patil, 2010, PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in Python, J Stat Software, 35, 1, 10.18637/jss.v035.i04 · DOI · Paper page
- Ahmad, 2001, Age Standardization of Rates: a New WHO Standard. GPE Discussion Paper No. 31
- Liu, 1993, Prevalence and aetiology of profound deafness in the general population of Sichuan, China, J Laryngol Otol, 107, 990, 10.1017/S0022215100125071 · doi:10.1017/s0022215100125071
- Freeland, 2010, Sensorineural deafness in Tanzanian children–is ototoxicity a significant cause? A pilot study, Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 74, 516, 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.02.010 · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.02.010
- Sorensen, 2005, Time to Concentrate: 7th Annual Hearing Aid Industry Report
- World Health Organization. Hearing aids and services for developing countries, 2001, Rev Panam Salud Publica, 10, 139, 10.1590/S1020-49892001000800014 · doi:10.1590/s1020-49892001000800014
Cited by
Global hearing health care: new findings and perspectives
Wilson, B. S., Tucci, D. L., Merson, M. H., & O'Donoghue, G. M. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31073-5 · Cited by 567
Hearing loss grades and the International classification of functioning, disability and health
Olusanya, B. O., Davis, A. C., & Hoffman, H. J. (2019) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.19.230367 · Cited by 438
Knipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002 · Cited by 309
Ma'u, E., Cullum, S., Cheung, G., Livingston, G., & Mukadam, N. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100191 · Cited by 82
The exposome of healthy and accelerated aging across 40 countries
Hernandez, H., Santamaria-Garcia, H., Moguilner, S., Farina, F. R., Legaz, A., Prado, P., Cuadros, J., Gonzalez, L., Gonzalez-Gomez, R., Migeot, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03808-2 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, G., Flaxman, S., Brunskill, E., Mascarenhas, M., Mathers, C. D., & Finucane, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 146-152
- ISSN
- 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-360X
- OpenAlex
- W2137992646
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurpub/ckr176
- The paper
- Stevens, G., Flaxman, S., Brunskill, E., Mascarenhas, M., Mathers, C. D., & Finucane, M. (2013). Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries. European Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckr176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.