Cited by 74Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHospital Admissions and OutcomesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Transitions between health care settings in the final three months of life in four EU countries

Open access
Van den Block, Lieve, Pivodic, Lara, Pardon, Koen, Donker, Gé, Miccinesi, Guido, Moreels, Sarah, Vega Alonso, Tomas, Deliens, Luc +1 more·2015·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transitions between care settings may be related to poor quality in end-of-life care. Yet there is a lack of cross-national population-based data on transitions at the end of life. METHOD: International mortality follow-back study with data collection in Belgium, Netherlands, Italy and Spain (2009-11) via existing representative epidemiological surveillance networks of general practitioners (GPs). All general practitioners reported weekly, on a standardized registration form, every deceased patient (≥18 years) in their practice and identified those who died 'non-suddenly'. RESULTS: Among 4791 non-sudden deaths in Belgium, Netherlands, Italy and Spain, 59%, 55%, 60% and 58%, respectively, were transferred between care settings at least once in the final 3 months of life (10%, 8%, 10% and 13% in final 3 days of life); 10%, 5%, 8% and 12% were transferred three times or more (P < 0.001 in multivariate analyses adjusting for country differences in age, sex, cause of death, presence of dementia). In all countries, transitions were more frequent among patients residing at home (61-73%) than among patients residing in a care home (33-40%). Three months before death 5-7% of patients were in hospital, and this rose to 27-39% on the day of death. Patient wishes were cited as the reason for the last transition before death in 27%, 39%, 9% and 6% of cases in Belgium, Netherlands, Italy and Spain, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: End-of-life transitions between health care settings are common across EU countries, in particular late hospitalizations for people residing at home. Frequency, type and reasons for terminal hospitalizations vary between countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckv039

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients receiving palliative care frequently experience multiple transitions between hospital and home.

    “Patients receiving palliative care frequently experience multiple transitions between hospital and home [15, 16].”

    From Experiences of family caregivers of patients with end-of-life cancer during the transition from hospital to home palliative care: a qualitative study (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The ‘Transitions between health care settings’ section reports that 55–60% of patients who died non-suddenly moved between care settings at least once in their final three months, and ‘Final transitions to place of death’ identifies home-to-hospital as the most common final transition. But the study does not establish that patients receiving palliative care frequently made multiple moves between hospital and home: it did not define its population by receipt of palliative care, and only 5–12% had three or more transitions of any kind. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Teno JM, Gozalo PL, Bynum JP, et al. Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA 2013;309:470-7.
  2. Gozalo P, Teno JM, Mitchell SL, et al. End-of-life transitions among nursing home residents with cognitive issues. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1212-21.
  3. Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:549-55.
  4. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson IJ. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2013;12:7.
  5. Meeussen K, Van den Block L, Bossuyt N, et al. GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death. Br J Gen Pract 2009;59:665-760.
  6. Ko W, Beccaro M, Miccinesi G, et al. Awareness of general practitioners concerning cancer patients' preferences for place of death: evidence from four European countries. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1967-74.
  7. Boockvar K, Fishman E, Kyriacou CK, et al. Adverse events due to discontinuations in drug use and dose changes in patients transferred between acute and long-term care facilities. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:545-50.
  8. National Institutes of Health. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Improving End-of-Life Care. NIH Consensus and State-of-the-Science Statements, Vol. 21. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2004.
  9. Van den Block L, Deschepper R, Bilsen J, et al. Transitions between care settings at the end of life in Belgium. JAMA 2007;298:1638-9.
  10. Abarshi E, Echteld M, Van den Block L, et al. Transitions between care settings at the end of life in the Netherlands: results from a nationwide study. Palliat Med 2010; 24:166-74.
  11. Kaspers PJ, Pasman HR, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Deeg DJ. Changes over a decade in end-of-life care and transfers during the last 3 months of life: a repeated survey among proxies of deceased older people. Palliat Med 2013;27:544-52.
  12. Klinkenberg M, Visser G, van Groenou MI, et al. The last 3 months of life: care, transitions and the place of death of older people. Health Soc Care Community 2005; 13:420-30.
  13. Cohen J, Bilsen J, Addington-Hall J, et al. Population-based study of dying in hospital in six European countries. Palliat Med 2008;22:702-10.
  14. Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Where people die (1974-2030): past trends, future pro- jections and implications for care. Palliat Med 2008;22:33-41.
  15. Van den Block L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Meeussen K, et al. Nationwide continuous monitoring of end-of-life care via representative networks of general practitioners in Europe. BMC Fam Pract 2013;14:73.
  16. Abarshi E, Echteld MA, Van den Block L, et al. Use of palliative care services and general practitioner visits at the end of life in the Netherlands and Belgium. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;41:436-48.
  17. Meeussen K, Van den Block L, Echteld MA, et al. End-of-life care and circumstances of death in patients dying as a result of cancer in Belgium and the Netherlands: a retrospective comparative study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:4327-34.
  18. Van den Block L, Deschepper R, Bossuyt N, et al. Care for patients in the last months of life: the Belgian Sentinel Network Monitoring End-of-Life Care study. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1747-54.
  19. Evans N, Costantini M, Pasman HR, et al. End-of-life communication: a retro- spective survey of representative general practitioner networks in four countries. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;47:604-19.
  20. Meeussen K, Van den Block L, Echteld M, et al. Older people dying with dementia: a nationwide study. Int Psychogeriatr 2012;24:1581-91.
  21. Van den Block L, Van Casteren V, Deschepper R, et al. Nationwide monitoring of end-of-life care via the Sentinel Network of General Practitioners in Belgium: the research protocol of the SENTI-MELC study. BMC Palliat Care 2007;6:6.
  22. Van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, et al. End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 2003;362:345-50.
  23. Bilsen J, Cohen J, Chambaere K, et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1119-21.
  24. Abarshi E, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Donker G, et al. General practitioner awareness of preferred place of death and correlates of dying in a preferred place: a nationwide mortality follow-back study in the Netherlands 2009;38:568-77.
  25. Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, et al. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ 2005;330:1007-11.
  26. Addington-Hall J, Fakhoury W, McCarthy M. Specialist palliative care in nonmalignant disease. Palliat Med 1998;12:417-27.
  27. Perrels AJ, Fleming J, Zhao J, et al. Place of death and end-of-life transitions experienced by very old people with differing cognitive status: retrospective analysis of a prospective population-based cohort aged 85 and over. Palliat Med 2014;28:220-33.
  28. Quill TE, Abernathy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care-creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1173-5.
  29. Houttekier D, Cohen J, Van den Block L, et al. Involvement of palliative care services strongly predicts place of death in Belgium. J Palliat Med 2010;13:1461-8.
  30. Jordhøy MS, Fayers P, Saltnes T, et al. A palliative-care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 2000;356:888-93.
  31. OECD. Long-term care beds in institutions and hospitals. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators, 2013. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues- migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2013/long-term-care-beds-in-institutions-and- hospitals_health_glance-2013-78-en (17 December 2014, date last accessed).
  32. OECD. Key tables from OECD: Hospital beds density per 1000 population. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/hospital- beds_20758480-table5 (17 December 2014, date last accessed).
  33. Evans N, Pasman HR, Vega Alonso T, et al. End-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appoint- ments. PLoS One 2013;8:e57965.
  34. Costantini M, Morasso G, Montella M, et al. Diagnosis and prognosis disclosure among cancer patients. Results from an Italian mortality follow-back survey. Ann Oncol 2006;17:853-9.
  35. Pivodic L, Van den Block L, Pardon K, et al. Burden on family carers and care- related financial strain at the end of life: a cross-national population-based study. Eur J Public Health 2014;24:819-26.
  36. Evans N, Pasman HR, Vega Alonso T, et al. End-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appoint- ments. PLoS One 2013;8:e57965.
  37. Pivodic L, Pardon K, Van den Block L, et al. Palliative care service use in four European countries: a cross-national retrospective study via representative networks of general practitioners. PLoS One 2013;8:e84440.
  38. Hank K, Ju ¨rges H. The last year of life in Europe: regional variations in functional status and sources of support. Ageing Soc 2010;30:1041-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van den Block, L., Pivodic, L., Pardon, K., Donker, G., Miccinesi, G., Moreels, S., Vega Alonso, T., Deliens, L., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
  • Istituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica (IT)
  • Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique (BE)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2015-03-30
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
569-575
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2047469502
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007, 264697)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
end-of-life care, terminal hospitalization, last days of life, care homes, patient wishes, cross-national comparison, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
MeSH terms
Transitional Care, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Dementia, Europe, Female, Hospices, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Terminal Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review