The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews
Open accessAbstract
Background: Multimorbidity, the coexistence of multiple health conditions, is a growing public health challenge. Research and intervention development are hampered by the lack of consensus regarding defining and measuring multimorbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to pool the findings of systematic reviews examining definitions and measures of multimorbidity. Methods: Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane were searched from database inception to February 2017. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts and extracted data from the included papers. Disagreements were resolved with a third author. Reviews were quality assessed. Results: Of six reviews, two focussed on definitions and four on measures. Multimorbidity was commonly defined as the presence of multiple diseases or conditions, often with a cut-off of two or more. One review developed a holistic definition including biopsychosocial and somatic factors as well as disease. Reviews recommended using measures validated for the outcome of interest. Disease counts are an alternative if no validated measure exists. Conclusions: To enable comparison between studies and settings, researchers and practitioners should be explicit about their choice of definition and measure. Using a cut-off of two or more conditions as part of the definition is widely adopted. Measure selection should be based on tools validated for the outcome being considered. Where there is no validated measure, or where multiple outcomes or populations are being considered, disease counts are appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Barnett, K., Mercer, S. W., Norbury, M., Watt, G., Wyke, S., & Guthrie, B. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2 · Cited by 6,972
Self-citationThe World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing
Beard, J. R., Officer, A., de Carvalho, I. A., Sadana, R., Pot, A. M., Michel, J.-P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., Epping-Jordan, J. E., Peeters, G. M. E. E. (., Mahanani, W. R., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00516-4 · Cited by 3,287
Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature
Marengoni, A., Angleman, S., Melis, R., Mangialasche, F., Karp, A., Garmen, A., Meinow, B., & Fratiglioni, L. (2011) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003 · Cited by 3,092
How to measure comorbiditya critical review of available methods
DEGROOT, V, BECKERMAN, H., LANKHORST, G., & BOUTER, L. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00585-1 · Cited by 1,757
A Systematic Review of Prevalence Studies on Multimorbidity: Toward a More Uniform Methodology
Fortin, M., Stewart, M., Poitras, M.-E., Almirall, J., & Maddocks, H. (2012) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1337 · Cited by 1,135
Violan, C., Foguet-Boreu, Q., Flores-Mateo, G., Salisbury, C., Blom, J., Freitag, M., Glynn, L., Muth, C., & Valderas, J. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102149 · Cited by 1,125
Smith, S. M., Wallace, E., O'Dowd, T., & Fortin, M. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006560.pub3 · Cited by 883
Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review
Prados-Torres, A., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., Hancco-Saavedra, J., Poblador-Plou, B., & van den Akker, M. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.021 · Cited by 808
Cited by
Skou, S. T., Mair, F. S., Fortin, M., Guthrie, B., Nunes, B. P., Miranda, J. J., Boyd, C. M., Pati, S., Mtenga, S., & Smith, S. M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00376-4 · Cited by 1,362
Ho, I. S.-S., Azcoaga-Lorenzo, A., Akbari, A., Black, C., Davies, J., Hodgins, P., Khunti, K., Kadam, U., Lyons, R. A., McCowan, C., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00107-9 · Cited by 339
Self-citationTan, Y. Y., Papez, V., Chang, W. H., Mueller, S. H., Denaxas, S., & Lai, A. G. (2022) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00186-6 · Cited by 283
Jani, B. D., Hanlon, P., Nicholl, B. I., McQueenie, R., Gallacher, K. I., Lee, D., & Mair, F. S. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1305-x · Cited by 268
Kleykamp, B. A., Ferguson, M. C., McNicol, E., Bixho, I., Arnold, L. M., Edwards, R. R., Fillingim, R., Grol-Prokopczyk, H., Turk, D. C., & Dworkin, R. H. (2021) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.10.006 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, M. C., Crilly, M., Black, C., Prescott, G. J., & Mercer, S. W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-06-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 182-189
- ISSN
- 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-360X
- OpenAlex
- W2805062403
- Cited by
- 847
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurpub/cky098
- The paper
- Johnston, M. C., Crilly, M., Black, C., Prescott, G. J., & Mercer, S. W. (2019). Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews. European Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.