Cited by 20Emergency and Acute Care StudiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Patient-perceived benefits of and barriers to using out-of-hours primary care centres

Shipman, C., Payne, F., Dale, J., Jessopp, L.·2001·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of GP co-operatives has encouraged the development of primary care centres, but little is known about patients' views and experiences of these new forms of out-of-hours service delivery. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to understand patients' views, expectations and experiences of attending an out-of-hours primary care centre which was part of an inner London GP co-operative. METHODS: Systematic samples of patients using the out-of-hours service received semi-structured interviews covering the decision to contact the service, expectations and experience of the service and, if relevant, the experience of travelling to the primary care centre. Interviews were conducted by telephone between 7 and 10 days after patient contact. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 55.4% (72/130) of sampled patients who were primary care centre attenders, 50.0% (47/94) of those receiving telephone advice and 45.3% (53/117) of those receiving a home visit. Most attenders of the primary care centre said that they were satisfied with the consultation (90.0%, 65) and were able to get all the help they needed (83%, 60). The speed of being seen and the opportunity of having a face-to-face consultation were key benefits identified. For some, this outweighed difficulties experienced in attending the centre, including arranging transport, caring for other children, managing several children on the journey and travelling while ill. The main barriers patients identified for not wanting to attend the primary care centre included feeling too ill to travel, having other dependants to care for or lacking transportation. CONCLUSIONS: While primary care centres offer patients speedy access to face-to-face consultations, there are a range of obstacles which are encountered. Those who are socially disadvantaged appear likely to experience greatest difficulty, raising concerns about equity in access to services. Out-of-hours services may need to give consideration to patient transport and a more flexible approach to visiting at home if such inequities are to be avoided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/18.2.149

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dale J. Where to site an emergency centre. Manag Gen Pract 1996; 19: 11-13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shipman, C., Payne, F., Dale, J., & Jessopp, L.
Affiliations
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Shipman, C.
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
149-155
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W1972374985
Cited by
20
References
11
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
out-of-hours primary care, primary care centres, patient satisfaction, patient experience, access barriers, patient transport, home visits, telephone advice, social deprivation, equitable access, inner London
MeSH terms
Female, United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Office Visits, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, State Medicine, Chi-Square Distribution, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review