Cited by 49Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

New-onset palpitations in general practice: assessing the discriminant value of items within the clinical history

Summerton, N, Mann, S, Rigby, A, Petkar, S, Dhawan, J·2001·Family Practice

Abstract

Background Palpitations are non-specific, with less than half of patients experiencing palpitations having a cardiac arrhythmia. Currently it seems that there is little evidence available to assist GPs in discriminating between patients complaining of palpitations who have significant cardiac arrhythmias and those who do not. Objectives Our aim was to estimate discriminant functions for specific items of clinical information in relation to the categorization of a patient (aged over 18 years) with a symptom of new-onset palpitations presenting to primary care. Methods A network of 62 GPs spread amongst 36 practices agreed to recruit patients with new-onset palpitations over the course of a 9-month study period. Patients consenting to be involved in the study were asked a number of questions, focusing particularly on the medical history, and were requested to complete a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Each patient was also provided with a RhythmCard cardiac event recorder for up to 2 weeks and was asked to record their heart rhythm if they experienced palpitations. Odds ratios (adjusted for age and sex) were used to compare the clinical information obtained from patients with the final diagnosis. Results Of the 139 patients with palpitations presenting to GPs, it would appear that males [odds ratio = 2.1 (1.0-4.5)], those with regular palpitations [odds ratio = 2.5 (1.0-5.8)], those experiencing palpitations at work [odds ratio = 3.0 (1.3-7.2)] and those experiencing pal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/18.4.383

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Summerton, N., Mann, S., Rigby, A., Petkar, S., & Dhawan, J.
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
383-392
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2136412834
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
cardiac arrhythmias, medical history, primary care, anxiety and depression, sex differences, dose-response relationship, arrhythmia diagnosis, general practitioners, symptom assessment, cardiac catheterization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Medical History Taking, Middle Aged, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Discriminant Analysis, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review