Cited by 12Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Primary care experience and remission of type 2 diabetes: a population-based prospective cohort study

Open access
Dambha-Miller, Hajira, Day, Alexander, Kinmonth, Ann Louise, Griffin, Simon J·2021·Family Practice

Abstract

Background: Remission of Type 2 diabetes is achievable through dietary change and weight loss. In the UK, lifestyle advice and referrals to weight loss programmes predominantly occur in primary care where most Type 2 diabetes is managed. Objective: To quantify the association between primary care experience and remission of Type 2 diabetes over 5-year follow-up. Methods: A prospective cohort study of adults with Type 2 diabetes registered to 49 general practices in the East of England, UK. Participants were followed-up for 5 years and completed the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure (CARE) on diabetes-specific primary care experiences over the first year after diagnosis of the disease. Remission at 5-year follow-up was measured with HbA1c levels. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to quantify the association between primary care experience and remission of diabetes. Results: Of 867 participants, 30% (257) achieved remission of Type 2 diabetes at 5 years. Six hundred twenty-eight had complete data at follow-up and were included in the analysis. Participants who reported higher CARE scores in the 12 months following diagnosis were more likely to achieve remission at 5 years in multivariable models; odds ratio = 1.03 (95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.05, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Primary care practitioners should pay greater attention to delivering optimal patient experiences alongside clinical management of the disease as this may contribute towards remission of Type 2 diabetes. Further work is needed to examine which aspects of the primary care experience might be optimized and how these could be operationalized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmaa086

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ et al Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9786): 156– 67. 21705063 PMC3136726

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dambha-Miller, H., Day, A., Kinmonth, A. L., & Griffin, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2020-09-12
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
140-145
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W3086482982
Cited by
12
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (G061895)
  • Medical Research Council (G0001164)
  • NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (RP-PG-0606-1259)
  • National Health Service R&D
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
type 2 diabetes remission, patient experience, CARE measure, general practice, HbA1c, lifestyle advice, slimming program, patient-clinician relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review