The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that health professionals do not discuss sexually related issues in consultations as often as patients would like. Although primary care has been identified as the preferred place to seek treatment for sexual health concerns, little is known either of the factors that prevent GPs and practice nurses initiating such discussions or of how they feel communication in this area could be improved. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to identify barriers perceived by GPs and practice nurses to inhibit discussion of sexual health issues in primary care and explore strategies to improve communication in this area. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs and 35 practice nurses recruited from diverse practices throughout Sheffield. RESULTS: The term 'can of worms' summarized participants' beliefs that sexually related issues are highly problematic within primary care because of their sensitivity, complexity and constraints of time and expertise. Particular barriers were identified to discussing sexual health with patients of the opposite gender, patients from Black and ethnic minority groups, middle-aged and older patients, and non-heterosexual patients. Potential strategies to improve communication about sexual health within primary care included training, providing patient information and expanding the role of the practice nurse; however, several limitations to these approaches were identified. CONCLUSION: GPs and practice nurses do not address sexual health issues proactively with patients, and this area warrants further attention if policy recommendations to expand the role of primary care within sexual health management are to be met.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1993) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,576
Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide To Qualitative Observation And Analysis
Lofland, J., & , J. (1971) · Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) · Cited by 5,625
(1990) · Cited by 5,210
The Royal College of General Practitioners
Fry, J. (1983) · Present State and Future Needs in General Practice · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-7304-9_14 · Cited by 1,317
Medicine as culture: illness, disease and the body in Western societies
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-5337 · Cited by 613
General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people
Gott, M., Hinchliff, S., & Galena, E. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.025 · Cited by 367
Self-citationGott, M. (2003) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmg612 · Cited by 270
Self-citationRead, S., King, M., & Watson, J. (1997) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024665 · Cited by 250
GPs' views on their management of sexual dysfunction
Humphery, S., & Nazareth, I. (2001) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/18.5.516 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Flynn, K. E., Lin, L., Bruner, D. W., Cyranowski, J. M., Hahn, E. A., Jeffery, D. D., Reese, J. B., Reeve, B. B., Shelby, R. A., & Weinfurt, K. P. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.08.011 · Cited by 528
Dyer, K., & das Nair, R. (2013) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02856.x · Cited by 370
Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion
Bailey, J. V., Murray, E., Rait, G., Mercer, C. H., Morris, R. W., Peacock, R., Cassell, J., & Nazareth, I. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006483.pub2 · Cited by 183
Treatment of pelvic endometriosis with etonogestrel subdermal implant (Implanon®)
Yisa, S. B., Okenwa, A. A., & Husemeyer, R. P. (2005) · Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.1783/0000000052972799 · Cited by 54
Holden, C. A., Jolley, D. J., McLachlan, R. I., Pitts, M., Cumming, R., Wittert, G., Handelsman, D. J., & Kretser, D. M. (2006) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00637.x · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Gott, M.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 528-536
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2113932960
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/cmh509
- The paper
- Gott, M. (2004). "Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.