The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual dysfunction in primary medical care: prevalence, characteristics and detection by the general practitioner
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the recent focus on sexual behaviour and AIDs, there are almost no data on the prevalence of sexual dysfunction within primary care settings. METHOD: One hundred and seventy patients attending a general practice participated in a questionnaire survey of the prevalence and characteristics of sexual problems. The detection rate of the general practitioners (GPs) and indicators in the patient notes were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty five per cent of the men (n = 22) reported some form of specific sexual dysfunction: premature ejaculation was identified in 31 per cent of the men; 17 per cent experienced erectile dysfunction, which was associated with current medication, a high mean annual attendance and increasing age. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in the women was 42 per cent (n = 41); vaginismus was reported by 30 per cent of the sample; 23 per cent of the women suffered from anorgasmia. General sexual dissatisfaction was more common than specific dysfunction; 68 per cent (n = 66) of the women and 75 per cent (n = 54) of the men reported at least one problem with dissatisfaction, avoidance, infrequency or non-communication. The large majority of the sample (70 per cent) considered sexual matters to be an appropriate topic for the GP to discuss. Despite this, sexual problems were recorded in only 2 per cent of the GP notes. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high prevalence of sexual disorders in the population. Many of these problems are concealed from GPs. Predictors in patients' notes could help GPs to detect those patients with more serious problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunctions: Results from a Decade of Research
Simons, J. S., & Carey, M. P. (2001) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1002729318254 · Cited by 472
Multicenter Study on the Prevalence of Sexual Symptoms in Male Hypo- and Hyperthyroid Patients
Carani, C., Isidori, A. M., Granata, A., Carosa, E., Maggi, M., Lenzi, A., & Jannini, E. A. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1135 · Cited by 416
Gott, M. (2004) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh509 · Cited by 414
Frühauf, S., Gerger, H., Schmidt, H. M., Munder, T., & Barth, J. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0062-0 · Cited by 345
On categorization and quantification of women's sexual dysfunctions: An epidemiological approach
Öberg, K., Fugl-Meyer, A. R., & Fugl-Meyer, K. S. (2004) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901151 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Read, S., King, M., & Watson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-391
- ISSN
- 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3842
- 1741-3850
- OpenAlex
- W2152110880
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual dysfunction in primary medical care: prevalence, characteristics and detection by the general practitioner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024665
- The paper
- Read, S., King, M., & Watson, J. (1997). Sexual dysfunction in primary medical care: prevalence, characteristics and detection by the general practitioner. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.