CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 759Cultural Competency in Health CareMigration, Identity, and HealthPublic Health and Social Inequalities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review

Open access
Scheppers, E.·2006·Family Practice
DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmi113
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ethnic minority patients seem to be confronted with barriers when using health services. Yet, care providers are often oblivious to these barriers, although they may share to some extent the burden of responsibility for them. In order to enlighten care providers, as to the potential pitfalls that may exist, there is a need to explore the different factors in the creation of the barriers. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, the objective of this paper is to present an overview of the potential barriers and the factors, which may restrict ethnic minority patients from using health services, according to the literature available. METHODS: Articles published from 1990 to 2003 were identified by searching electronic databases and selected through titles and abstracts. The articles were included if deemed to be relevant to study health services use by ethnic minorities, i.e. the different factors in the creation of a barrier. RESULTS: There were 54 articles reviewed. They reported on studies carried out in different countries and among different ethnic minorities. Potential barriers occurred at three different levels: patient level, provider level and system level. The barriers at patient level were related to the patient characteristics: demographic variables, social structure variables, health beliefs and attitudes, personal enabling resources, community enabling resources, perceived illness and personal health practices. The barriers at provider level were related to the provider characteristics: skills and attitudes. The barriers at system level were related to the system characteristics: the organisation of the health care system. CONCLUSION: This review has the goal of raising awareness about the myriad of potential barriers, so that the problem of barriers to health care for different ethnic minorities becomes transparent. In conclusion, there are many different potential barriers of which some are tied to ethnic minorities. The barriers are all tied to the particular situation of the individual patient and subject to constant adjustment. In other words, generalizations should not be made.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmi113

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dijk van R. Interculturalisation of health care: Dutch lessons. Utrecht: Paper to the International conference Service provision for migrants and refugees; 2003.
  2. David M, Borde T, Yu ¨ksel E, Kentenich H. Aspekte der gesundheitlichen Versorgung tu ¨rkischer Migrantinnen in Deutschland. Curare 1997; 11: 373-378.
  3. Grube M. Evaluation eines Verbundsprojekts zur Behandlung psychisch erkrankter tu ¨rkischer Migranten. Psychiat Prax 2001; 28: 81-83.
  4. Berg G. Arbeitsmigrantinnen in der Bundesrepublik- Kulturspezifische Gesundheits/Krankheitskonzepte. Curare 1997; 11: 367-371.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 758

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Scheppers, E.
Corresponding author
Scheppers, E.
ORCID
Scheppers, E.
Venue
Family Practice
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2006-02-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
325-348
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
DOI
10.1093/fampra/cmi113
OpenAlex
W2109218384
Cited by
759
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 33
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Identity, and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
ethnic minorities, barriers to care, health care utilization, patient characteristics, provider characteristics, health system organization, health beliefs, health attitudes, health care access, cultural competence
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Health Services, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Life Style, Male, Minority Groups, Netherlands, Sex Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Global Health, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review