Cited by 136Ethics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Short report: How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays?

Bower, P., Wilson, S., Mathers, N.·2007·Family Practice

Abstract

Recruitment to trials is often viewed as problematic but data are scarce. This study surveyed authors of published primary care trials to assess the scale of recruitment problems. Seventy trial authors were surveyed with a response rate of 56%. Less than one-third of trials recruited to their original timescale. Recruitment requiring GPs to gain patient consent was significantly associated with recruitment problems. The data may be useful in the wider drive to improve recruitment in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmm051

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fairhurst K, Dowrick C. Problems with recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of counselling in general practice: causes and implications. J Health Serv Res Policy 1996; 1: 77-80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bower, P., Wilson, S., & Mathers, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2007-11-13
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
601-603
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2131015924
Cited by
135
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
trial recruitment, general practitioners, patient consent
MeSH terms
Data Collection, United Kingdom, Humans, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review