Cited by 133Diabetes Management and EducationMedication Adherence and ComplianceHealth and Wellbeing Research

The importance of measuring self-efficacy in patients with diabetes

Mishali, M., Omer, H., Heymann, A. D.·2011·Family Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Self-efficacy is an important factor influencing diabetes self-management behaviours. Previous studies have examined self-efficacy as a general measure in diabetes care for all self-care treatment recommendations together. This current study was designed to examine if low self-efficacy in each of the measured self-care treatment recommendations is related to decreased adherence for each specific recommendation. METHODS: The self-efficacy was measured in 119 patients for four different treatment recommendations: blood glucose self-monitoring, exercise, diet and oral medication intake and correlated with The Resistance to Treatment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Significant and positive Pearson's correlations were found between the frequency of adherence to treatment recommendations and the self-efficacy regarding different recommendations. The correlation between self-efficacy and diet and physical activity was 0.5 and 0.67, respectively. The higher the resistance to treatment score, the less confident the patient is in his or her ability to adhere with treatment recommendations. This pattern was not present in adherence to medication intake. CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy impacts adherence to treatment and therefore plays a role in the clinical outcome. The practical implication is that assessment of self-efficacy in people with diabetes may be a first step in the development of individually tailored interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmq086

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishali, M., Omer, H., & Heymann, A. D.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Heymann, A. D.
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
82-87
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2118119249
Cited by
133
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
self-efficacy, diabetes mellitus, medication adherence, diabetes self-management, self-monitoring of blood glucose, physical activity, diet, treatment resistance, personalized interventions
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Exercise, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review