Cited by 32Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Web-based consultation between general practitioners and nephrologists: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
van Gelder, Vincent A, Scherpbier-de Haan, Nynke D, van Berkel, Saskia, Akkermans, Reinier P, de Grauw, Inge S, Adang, Eddy M, Assendelft, Pim J, de Grauw, Wim J C +2 more·2017·Family Practice

Abstract

Background: Consultation of a nephrologist is important in aligning care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the primary-secondary care interface. However, current consultation methods come with practical difficulties that can lead to postponed consultation or patient referral instead. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether a web-based consultation platform, telenephrology, led to a lower referral rate of indicated patients. Furthermore, we assessed consultation rate, quality of care, costs and general practitioner (GPs') experiences with telenephrology. Methods: Cluster randomized controlled trial with 47 general practices in the Netherlands was randomized to access to telenephrology or to enhanced usual care. A total of 3004 CKD patients aged 18 years or older who were under primary care were included (intervention group n = 1277, control group n = 1727) and 2693 completed the trial. All practices participated in a CKD management course and were given an overview of their CKD patients. Results: The referral rates amounted to 2.3% (n = 29) in the intervention group and 3.0% (n = 52) in the control group, which was a non-significant difference, OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.23. The intervention group's consultation rate was 6.3% (n = 81) against 5.0% (n = 87) (OR 2.00; 95% CI 0.75-5.33). We found no difference in quality of care or costs. The majority of GPs had a positive opinion about telenephrology. Conclusion: The data in our study do not allow for conclusions on the effect of telenephrology on the rate of patient referrals and provider-to-provider consultations, compared to conventional methods. It was positively evaluated by GPs and was non-inferior in terms of quality of care and costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmw131

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Van Gelder 2017 found little or no difference between groups for providers' adherence to advised monitoring criteria from national CKD guidelines, as measured by monitoring of disease progression and metabolic parameters (3004 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

    “The authors found little or no difference for providers' adherence to the advised monitoring criteria from national CKD guidelines, as measured by monitoring of disease progression and metabolic parameters (3004 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence; Analysis 1.1).”

    From Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care (2020) · cites this paper as Van Gelder 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Van Gelder 2017 found little or no difference between groups for referral rate (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.23; 3004 participants).

    “One trial of eConsults between PCPs and nephrologists reported that there was little or no difference between groups for referral rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.23; Van Gelder 2017; 3004 participants).”
  • Eminović 2009 and Van Gelder 2017 reported little or no difference between groups for costs (Eminović 2009: MD EUR 32.5, 95% CI −29.0 to 74.7, 605 participants; Van Gelder 2017: IG EUR 453.86, 95% CI 392.98 to 514.74; CG EUR 433.74, 95% CI 387.64 to 479.84, P = 0.60; 3004 participants).

    “Two trials (teledermatology and telenephrology, respectively) reported little or no difference between groups for costs (Eminović 2009, 605 participants; MD EUR 32.5, 95% CI −29.0 to 74.7; Van Gelder 2017; 3004 participants; IG: EUR 453.86, 95% CI 392.98 to 514.74; CG EUR 433.74, 95% CI 387.64 to 479.84, P = 0.60).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]10. Scherpbier-de Haan ND, Wetzels JF, Vervoort GM, de Grauw WJC. Telenefrologie kan verwijzing voorkomen. Med Contact (Bussum) 2011; 66(27): 1729-31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Gelder, V. A., Scherpbier-de Haan, N. D., van Berkel, S., Akkermans, R. P., de Grauw, I. S., Adang, E. M., Assendelft, P. J., de Grauw, W. J. C., Biermans, M. C. J., & Wetzels, J. F. M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
430-436
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2584231885
Cited by
32
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Nierstichting
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
telenephrology, teleconsultation, chronic kidney disease, general practitioners, nephrologists, referral rates, primary-secondary care interface, consultation rates, quality of care, health care costs, GP experiences, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Nephrologists, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review