The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contribution of chloride channel permease to fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans
Abstract
Genes encoding fluoride transporters have been identified in bacterial and archaeal species. The genome sequence of the cariogenic Streptococcus mutans bacteria suggests the presence of a putative fluoride transporter, which is referred to as a chloride channel permease. Two homologues of this gene (GenBank locus tags SMU_1290c and SMU_1289c) reside in tandem in the genome of S. mutans The aim of this study was to determine whether the chloride channel permeases contribute to fluoride resistance. We constructed SMU_1290c- and SMU_1289c-knockout S. mutans UA159 strains. We also constructed a double-knockout strain lacking both genes. SMU_1290c or SMU_1289c was transformed into a fluoride transporter- disrupted Escherichia coli strain. All bacterial strains were cultured under appropriate conditions with or without sodium fluoride, and fluoride resistance was evaluated. All three gene-knockout S. mutans strains showed lower resistance to sodium fluoride than did the wild-type strain. No significant changes in resistance to other sodium halides were recognized between the wild-type and double-knockout strains. Both SMU_1290c and SMU_1289c transformation rescued fluoride transporter-disrupted E. coli cell from fluoride toxicity. We conclude that the chloride channel permeases contribute to fluoride resistance in S. mutans.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“different studies have come to different conclusions about whether 1289 only (19), or both 1289 and 1290 (30), contribute to fluoride efflux.”
From Fluoride export is required for the competitive fitness of pathogenic microorganisms in dental biofilm models (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“The literature features contrasting results, with one study concluding that both ORFs 1289 and 1290 contribute to fluoride resistance (30), and another study concluding that 1289 only was responsible for the fluoride resistance phenotype(19)”
From Fluoride export is required for the competitive fitness of pathogenic microorganisms in dental biofilm models (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1126/science.1215063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000336397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000261354 · DOI
- 10.1038/415287a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000261494 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.35.9.1804 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0122630 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90025-7 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.107.106781 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345900690S126 · DOI
- 10.1080/000163599428562 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Banerjee, A., Kang, C.-Y., An, M., Koff, B. B., Sunder, S., Kumar, A., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Stockbridge, R. B. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00184-24 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Murata, T., & Hanada, N.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-04-15
- Volume
- 363
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- fnw101
- ISSN
- 1574-6968
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review