Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Insight on the Response of Bacteria to Fluoride

Breaker, R.R.·2012·Caries Research

Abstract

Fluoride has been used for decades to prevent caries and it is well established that this anion can inhibit the growth of bacteria. However, the precise effects that fluoride has on bacteria and the mechanisms that bacteria use to overcome fluoride toxicity have largely remained unexplored. Recently, my laboratory reported the discovery of biological systems that bacteria use to sense fluoride and reduce fluoride toxicity. These sensors and their associated genes are very widespread in biology, which has implications for a number of issues that are central to the use of fluoride for dental care. Below I provide a summary of our findings, comment on some of the key prospects for expanding our understanding of fluoride's effects on biology, and propose some future uses of this knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000336397

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aqueous F− at 10-100 μM inhibits phosphoryl-transfer enzymes essential for energy production and nucleic acid synthesis, making it potentially toxic to cells.

    “Aqueous F−, ubiquitous in the environment at 10–100-µM levels, is potentially toxic to cells because at these concentrations it inhibits phosphoryl-transfer enzymes essential for energy production and nucleic acid synthesis (Adamek et al., 2005; Breaker, 2012).”
  • CrcB export proteins function as passive fluoride-specific ion channels that require Na+ ions for transport activity.

    “In contrast, CrcB export proteins function as passive fluoride-specific ion channels that require Na+ ions for transport activity (4, 5, 23–26).”
  • At sublethal concentrations, fluoride disrupts microbial metabolic processes by inhibiting key enzymes such as enolase and pyrophosphatases, often by forming complexes with essential metal cofactors.

    “At sublethal concentrations, fluoride disrupts metabolic processes by inhibiting key enzymes, such as enolase and pyrophosphatases, often by forming complexes with essential metal cofactors (4, 5).”
  • ΔFluc E. coli is hypersensitive to F− in pH-neutral media, and this effect is reversed by expressing F− exporters with a rescue plasmid.

    “In previous work, a Fluc-knockout (ΔFluc) strain of E. coli was shown to be hypersensitive to F−, as assessed by growth in pH-neutral media, and this effect could be reversed by expressing F− exporters in the bacteria with a rescue plasmid (Breaker, 2012; Stockbridge et al., 2012).”
  • Plasma membranes of many bacteria, yeasts, and protozoa carry F− exporter proteins to maintain cytoplasmic F− below inhibitory concentrations.

    “Accordingly, plasma membranes of many bacteria, yeasts, and protozoa carry F− exporter proteins to maintain cytoplasmic F− below inhibitory concentrations (Breaker, 2012; Stockbridge et al., 2012, 2013; Li et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1126%2Fscience.1215063 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1177%2F00220345830620061201 · DOI
  3. 10.1016%2F0020-711X%2874%2990119-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1126%2Fscience.1190713 · DOI
  5. 10.1038%2Fsj.bdj.4803690 · DOI
  6. 10.1177%2F00220345820610062701 · DOI
  7. 10.1126%2Fscience.1100829 · DOI
  8. 10.1016%2FS0168-6445%2802%2900143-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1038%2Fsj.bdj.4812863 · DOI
  10. 10.1146%2Fannurev.biochem.78.070507.135656 · DOI
  11. 10.1016%2FS0378-1119%2896%2900323-X · DOI
  12. 10.1186%2F1472-6831-6-S1-S1 · DOI
  13. 10.1126%2Fscience.1159519 · DOI
  14. 10.1080%2F000163599428562 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1159%2F000261207 · DOI
  16. 10.1186%2Fgb-2010-11-3-r31 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Breaker, R. R.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
78-81
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
56
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review