Cited by 69Forest Management and PolicyFire effects on ecosystemsEconomic and Environmental Valuation

A Reformulation of the Cost Plus Net Value Change (C+NVC) Model of Wildfire Economics

Open access
Donovan, Geoffrey H., Rideout, Douglas B.·2003·Forest Science

Abstract

The Cost plus Net Value Change (C+NVC) model provides the theoretical foundation for wildland fire economics and provides the basis for the National Fire Management Analysis System (NFMAS). The C+NVC model is based on the earlier least Cost plus Loss model (LC+L) expressed by Sparhawk (1925). Mathematical and graphical analysis of the LC+L model illustrates two errors in model formulation. First, suppression is incorrectly modeled as a model output. Second, suppression and primary protection are incorrectly modeled as negatively correlated. These errors are shown to be perpetuated by the contemporary C+NVC model and to have serious implications for the model's capacity to correctly identify the most efficient level of fire management expenditure. A corrected graphical representation of the C+NVC model is presented, which allows the most efficient level of fire management expenditure to be correctly identified. FOR. SCI. 49(2):318–323.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/forestscience/49.2.318

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estimates for civilian rates of PTSD and other anxiety disorders after a disaster range from 30% to 60%.

    “Estimates for civilian rates of PTSD and other anxiety disorders after a disaster range from 30 % 76 to 60 %.77”

    From The costs and losses of wildfires: a literature survey (2017) · cites this paper as [77]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donovan, G. H., & Rideout, D. B.
Affiliations
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Forest Science
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
318-323
ISSN
  • 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3738
OpenAlex
W2308997070
Cited by
68
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Forest Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
fire suppression, primary protection, model reformulation, graphical method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review