The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regime Type and Diaspora Politics: A Dyadic Approach
Abstract
Why do some diaspora groups, but not others, play a prominent role in the formalization of cooperative political ties between their country of origin and their country of residence? This article adopts a novel dyadic approach to the study of diaspora politics by arguing that diaspora politics are simultaneously structured by regime type in the country of origin and in the country of residence. Diaspora groups can play a prominent role in the formalization of cooperative foreign policy ties between their country of origin and their country of residence in democracy–democracy dyads (i.e., when the country of origin and the country of residence are both democratic). In all other dyads (including authoritarian–authoritarian), diaspora groups’ political impact on the formalization of cooperative foreign policy ties tends to be limited. The democracy–democracy dyad approximates a necessary (but not a sufficient) condition; nationalism and international economic strategies adopted by the country of origin help shape diaspora politics. This article examines all four regime type dyads by focusing on diaspora politics in authoritarian Malaysia and democratic United States, which have notable populations of Chinese and of Indian origin.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, diasporas are likely to play a positive part in forging bilateral relations in democratic dyads, that is when the country of origin and the country of residence are both democratic, but are sidelined in other dyadic formations, as in authoritarian-authoritarian or democratic-authoritarian dyads (Mirilovic 2016).”
From Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics (2020) · cites this paper as Mirilovic 2016
Citations
Cites
Boix, C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804960 · Cited by 2,211
Diasporas and International Relations Theory
Shain, Y., & Barth, A. (2003) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818303573015 · Cited by 574
Research works printed but not linked: 78
- Acharya Amitav. 1999. “Containment, Engagement or Counter-Dominance: Malaysia’s Response to the Rise of China.” In Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, edited by Johnston Alastair Iain Ross Robert , 132–55. London: Routledge.
- Bachrack Stanley D. 1976. The Committee of One Million. China Lobby Politics 1953–1971. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Baginda Abdul Razak Abdullah. 2015. China-Malaysia Relations and Foreign Policy. London: Routledge. · DOI
- Barabantseva, 2005, “Trans-Nationalising Chineseness: Overseas Chinese Policies of the PRC’s Central Government.”, Asien, 96, 7
- 10.1017/S0008423909990011 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010414012463905 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/dsp.2011.0014 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0305741000012376 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/10670564.2014.953810 · DOI
- Congressional Record. 2008. 110th Congress, 2nd Session, Vol. 154, No. 154. United States-India Nuclear Cooperation Approval and Nonproliferation Enhancement Act.
- Dahl Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Das, 2010, “Indian and Chinese Diaspora.”, Think India Quarterly, 12, 174
- Embassy of India, Washington DC. 2011. Press Release—“Senate India Caucus Welcomes Ambassador Nirupama Rao.” November 30. Accessed March 30, 2016. https://www.indianembassy.org/archives_details.php?nid=1684.
- Faist Thomas. 2010. “Diaspora and Transnationalism: What Kind of Dance Partners?” In Diaspora and Transnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods, edited by Bauböck Rainer Faist Thomas , 9–34. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Fitzgerald Stephen. 1972. China and the Overseas Chinese: A Study of Peking’s Changing Policy 1949–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Freedman Amy L. 2000. Political Participation and Ethnic Minorities: Chinese Overseas in Malaysia, Indonesia, and the United States. New York: Routledge.
- Freedman, 2001, “The Effect of Government Policy and Institutions on Chinese Overseas Acculturation: The Case of Malaysia.”, Modern Asian Studies, 35, 411, 10.1017/S0026749X01002050 · DOI
- 10.2307/448614 · DOI
- 10.1111/0020-8833.00123 · DOI
- Heng Pek Koon. 1999. “Malaysia.” In The Encyclopedia of the Chinese Overseas, edited by Pan Lynn , 172–87. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Hirschman Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Holst Frederik. 2012. Ethnicization and Identity Construction in Malaysia. New York: Routledge. · DOI
- Huang, 2003, “Can India Overtake China?”, Foreign Policy, 137, 74, 10.2307/3183699 · DOI
- Kamdar, 2007, “The Real Prize in India-U.S. Relations.”, World Policy Journal, 23, 60, 10.1162/wopj.2007.23.4.60 · DOI
- Kapiszewski Andrzej. 2001. Nationals and Expatriates. Population and Labor Dilemmas of the Gulf Cooperation Council States. Reading: Ithaca Press.
- Kapur Devesh. 2010. Diaspora, Development, and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Katzenstein Peter. 2005. A World of Regions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Kaur Amarjit . 2006. “Malaysia.” In The Encyclopedia of the Indian Diaspora, edited by Lal Brij V. , 156–67. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
- 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00070.x · DOI
- Kissinger Henry. 2011. On China. New York: Penguin Books.
- 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2009.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00152_3.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00194.x · DOI
- Kuik Cheng-Chwee. 2013. “Making Sense of Malaysia’s China Policy: Asymmetry, Proximity, and Elite’s Domestic Authority.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 1–39. doi:10.1093/cjip/pot006. · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055410000201 · DOI
- Lindsay, 2002, “Getting Uncle Sam’s Ear: Will Ethnic Lobbies Cramp America’s Foreign Policy Style.”, Brookings Review, Winter, 37, 10.2307/20081021 · DOI
- 10.2307/2938740 · DOI
- Mearsheimer John Walt. Stephen 2007. The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux. · DOI
- 10.5129/001041510X12911363509675 · DOI
- 10.1177/0192512114535451 · DOI
- Mulligan, 2004, “Do Democracies Have Different Public Policies than Nondemocracies?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 51, 10.1257/089533004773563430 · DOI
- Nagarajan S. 2008. “Indians in Malaysia: Towards Vision 2020.” In Rising India and Indian Communities in East Asia, edited by Kesavapany K. Mani A. Ramasamy P. , 375–99. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. · DOI
- Nonini Donald M. 1997. “Shifting Identities, Positioned Imaginaries: Transnational Traversals and Reversals by Malaysian Chinese.” In Underground Empires: The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism, edited by Ong Aihwa Nonini Donald M. , 203–28. New York: Routledge.
- North Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/20043078 · DOI
- Olson Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, NY: Harvard University Press.
- 10.1017/S1598240800002824 · DOI
- Pye Lucian W. 1985. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Cambridge: Belknap Press. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00082.x · DOI
- Ramasamy P. 2008. “Politics of Indian Representation in Malaysia.” In Rising India and Indian Communities in East Asia, edited by Kesavapany K. Mani A. Ramasamy P. , 355–75. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. · DOI
- 10.1163/187119109X455955 · DOI
- Riddle, 2008, “Diasporas: Exploring Their Development Potential.”, ESR Review, 10, 28
- Rosato, 2003, “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.”, American Political Science Review, 97, 585, 10.1017/S0003055403000893 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00063.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00483.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00608.x · DOI
- 10.1080/10357823.2014.936361 · DOI
- Schedler Andreas . 2009. “Electoral Authoritarianism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Landman Todd Robinson Neil , 381–95. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. · DOI
- 10.2307/2586306 · DOI
- 10.2307/2152533 · DOI
- Shain Yossi. . 1999. Marketing the American Creed Abroad. Diasporas in the U.S. and Their Homelands. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- 10.1111/0020-8833.00164 · DOI
- Singh, 2011, “India–Malaysia Strategic Relations.”, Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 7, 85
- Singh Jaswanth. 2007. In Service of Emergent India. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
- Smith, 2003, “Diasporic Memberships in Historical Perspective: Comparative Insights from the Mexican, Italian und Polish Cases.”, International Migration Review, 37, 724, 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00156.x · DOI
- 10.1353/asp.2007.0014 · DOI
- Talbott Strobe. 2006. Engaging India: Diplomacy, Democracy and the Bomb. Revised ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Tan Chee-Beng. 2004. Chinese Overseas: Comparative Cultural Issues. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. · DOI
- Tharoor Shashi. 2012. Pax Indica. New Delhi, India: Penguin Books India.
- 10.1080/1369183X.2012.659126 · DOI
- USINPAC. 2008. “USINPAC Welcomes the NSG Safeguards Waiver for India.” Accessed August 4, 2015. http://www.usinpac.com/latest-press-release/1369-usinpac-welcomes-the-nsg-safeguards-waiver-for-india.
- Uslaner Eric M . 1998. “All in the Family? Interest Groups and Foreign Policy?” In Interest Group Politics, edited by Cigler Allan J. Loomis Burdett A. , 365–86. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Verba Sidney Scholzman Kay Lehman Brady Henry E. . 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. · DOI
- Waltz Kenneth . 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Wang Gungwu. 2001. Don’t Leave Home: Migration and the Chinese. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
- 10.1177/1354066105055486 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11366-007-9012-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics
ADAMSON, F. B. (2020) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12246 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirilovic, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mirilovic, Nikola
- ORCID
- Mirilovic, Nikola
- Venue
- Foreign Policy Analysis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-05-01
- Pages
- orw038
- ISSN
- 1743-8586 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8594
- OpenAlex
- W2342993084
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Foreign Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › China's Global Influence and Migration
- Keywords
- diaspora politics, political regimes, nationalism, Chinese diaspora, Indian diaspora, transnational political networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review